Skip to content

#RI-3103_add be for pipeline#837

Merged
AmirAllayarovSofteq merged 13 commits intomainfrom
feature/RI-3103_workbench_pipeline
Jun 30, 2022
Merged

#RI-3103_add be for pipeline#837
AmirAllayarovSofteq merged 13 commits intomainfrom
feature/RI-3103_workbench_pipeline

Conversation

@AmirAllayarovSofteq
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@AmirAllayarovSofteq AmirAllayarovSofteq added the feature New feature or request label Jun 30, 2022
@AmirAllayarovSofteq AmirAllayarovSofteq self-assigned this Jun 30, 2022
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@ArtemHoruzhenko ArtemHoruzhenko left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please rename bunch to batch everywhere
Also I can see that you used Promise.all even for standalone rather than .pipeline function. Let see how it will increase performance. May be it will be not a big difference with .pipeline and we can go with such approach

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@ArtemHoruzhenko ArtemHoruzhenko left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good

@AmirAllayarovSofteq AmirAllayarovSofteq merged commit 57d965b into main Jun 30, 2022
@AmirAllayarovSofteq AmirAllayarovSofteq deleted the feature/RI-3103_workbench_pipeline branch June 30, 2022 13:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

feature New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants