Skip to content

New release: 2.1.2 #615

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 29 commits into from
May 19, 2025
Merged

New release: 2.1.2 #615

merged 29 commits into from
May 19, 2025

Conversation

@burythehammer
Copy link
Collaborator

@burythehammer burythehammer commented May 19, 2025

New release with some updates:

  • Query Performance Factor now implemented for resources rediscloud_subscription and rediscloud_subscription_database
  • Reducing the amount of attachments for Private Service Connect from 40 down to 1, in tests and documentation

trentrosenbaum and others added 29 commits May 15, 2025 13:27
@trentrosenbaum @burythehammer
Updates the service_attachments to reduce from 40 to 1
ae54e89
@burythehammer
test: updating tests and docs to reflect fewer provider endpoints
c8637dd
@burythehammer
Merge pull request #611 from RedisLabs/fix/adjust-service-attachments
7df01ef 
Updates the service_attachments to reduce from 40 to 1
@burythehammer
feat: adding in support for query performance factors on affected res…
bad0b71 
…ources
@burythehammer
fix: missing schema for pro sub creation plan
a626de8
@trentrosenbaum @burythehammer
Update TestAccDataSourceRedisCloudProDatabase_basic config with RediS…
b55c2d8 
…earch module and 2x QPF
@trentrosenbaum @burythehammer
Updates datasource_rediscloud_pro_database_test to use a QPF of 2x
13a88a5
@trentrosenbaum @burythehammer
Reverts AA subs to not use query_performance_factor as not supported
e4d3eec
@trentrosenbaum @burythehammer
Reverts AA DB to not use query_performance_factor as not supported
2511465
@trentrosenbaum @burythehammer
initial updates for the query_performance_factor
141de6f
@trentrosenbaum @burythehammer
Updates pro sub and DB with QPF CustomDiff validation
28ad59c
@trentrosenbaum @burythehammer
New QPF based test
3208bb9
@trentrosenbaum @burythehammer
expands qpf test
4c8c2dc
@trentrosenbaum @burythehammer
Reverts the resource_rediscloud_pro_database_test to focus on non qpf…
ad66022 
… activities
@trentrosenbaum @burythehammer
Updates datasource and resources to handle QPF
1302048
@trentrosenbaum @burythehammer
Updates to use rediscloud-go-api v0.23.0
ddf2459
@trentrosenbaum @burythehammer
Introduces pro subscription test covering QPF
f723df5
@trentrosenbaum @burythehammer
Updates to pro sub and db for tests
fde6675
@trentrosenbaum @burythehammer
Reducing the TEST_PARALLELISM from 6 to 2 to locate test failure
350da73
@trentrosenbaum @burythehammer
set TEST_PARALLELISM to 1
7c1eac6
@trentrosenbaum @burythehammer
Updates to check that the QPF is within 2x to 16x range
79bd458
@trentrosenbaum @burythehammer
Udpates to validate QPF range value
7de8e74
@trentrosenbaum @burythehammer
Refined the QPF range to be 2x - 8x to match swagger api response
ef2c0f1
@trentrosenbaum @burythehammer
Restores the TEST_PARALLELISM to a value of 6
694367e
@burythehammer
test: renaming qpf tests so that smoke tests can pick out qpf
99d584a
@burythehammer
chore: changing pr workflow to include qpf tests
5b65d5d
@burythehammer
fix: regex for qpf workflow is wrong
2bd68a6
@burythehammer
fix: nil check on query performance factor
3c69143
@burythehammer
Merge pull request #599 from RedisLabs/feat/query_performance_factors
d38579a 
Adding in support for query performance factors on affected resources
@burythehammer burythehammer self-assigned this May 19, 2025
@burythehammer burythehammer merged commit ebb063b into main May 19, 2025
9 of 20 checks passed
burythehammer added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2025
@burythehammer
Merge pull request #615 from RedisLabs/develop
1719b69 
New release: 2.1.2
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@trentrosenbaum trentrosenbaum trentrosenbaum approved these changes

Assignees

@burythehammer burythehammer

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@burythehammer @trentrosenbaum