Skip to content

Conversation

@marcusholl
Copy link
Member

@marcusholl marcusholl commented Jun 12, 2025

Side node.18 is rather outdated.

@o-liver
Copy link
Member

o-liver commented Jun 12, 2025

Copy link
Member

@o-liver o-liver left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please also remove the if we have for bullseye images

Copy link
Member

@rodibrin rodibrin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lg2m

@marcusholl marcusholl force-pushed the marcusholl/pr/rmNode18 branch from 7c96679 to eb8a071 Compare June 12, 2025 07:32
@marcusholl marcusholl force-pushed the marcusholl/pr/rmNode18 branch from eb8a071 to 3a05433 Compare June 12, 2025 07:32
@marcusholl
Copy link
Member Author

please also remove the if we have for bullseye images

@o-liver : done

@marcusholl marcusholl requested a review from o-liver June 12, 2025 07:40
Copy link
Member

@o-liver o-liver left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good. We keep the rest of the java version logic in case we need it at a future point.

@o-liver o-liver merged commit 1c8720d into master Jun 12, 2025
9 checks passed
@o-liver o-liver deleted the marcusholl/pr/rmNode18 branch June 12, 2025 09:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants