Skip to content

Conversation

@wintered
Copy link
Contributor

@wintered wintered commented Aug 5, 2025

Proposed changes:

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 5, 2025

Summary of modified submissions

STP-Parti-Bitwuzla-16core

STP-Parti-Bitwuzla-8core

Z3-Parti-Z3pp-16core

Z3-Parti-Z3pp-32core

Z3-Parti-Z3pp-8core

Bitwuzla-16core

  • 2 authors
  • website: https://bitwuzla.github.io/
  • Participations
    • Parallel
      • Bitvec
        • all
      • Equality+MachineArith
        • ABV
        • ABVFP
        • ABVFPLRA
        • AUFBV
        • AUFBVFP
        • UFBV
        • UFBVFP
      • FPArith
        • all
      • QF_Bitvec
        • all
      • QF_Equality+Bitvec
        • QF_UFBVDT
      • QF_FPArith
        • QF_UFFPDTNIRA

Bitwuzla-32core

  • 2 authors
  • website: https://bitwuzla.github.io/
  • Participations
    • Parallel
      • Bitvec
        • all
      • Equality+MachineArith
        • ABV
        • ABVFP
        • ABVFPLRA
        • AUFBV
        • AUFBVFP
        • UFBV
        • UFBVFP
      • FPArith
        • all
      • QF_Bitvec
        • all
      • QF_Equality+Bitvec
        • QF_UFBVDT
      • QF_FPArith
        • QF_UFFPDTNIRA

Z3-alpha-base

  • 1 authors
  • website: https://github.com/Z3Prover/z3
  • Participations
    • SingleQuery
      • Arith
        • all
      • QF_Bitvec
        • all
      • QF_LinearIntArith
        • all
      • QF_LinearRealArith
        • all
      • QF_NonLinearIntArith
        • all
      • QF_NonLinearRealArith
        • all
      • QF_Strings
        • all

@wintered wintered requested review from bobot and martinjonas August 5, 2025 12:51
@bobot
Copy link
Contributor

bobot commented Aug 5, 2025

Is it normal that the two first commits are for submissions? Are they not already in the base branch?

@wintered wintered removed the request for review from martinjonas August 6, 2025 10:45
@wintered
Copy link
Contributor Author

wintered commented Aug 6, 2025

yes, it is normal. 2025_webpage was branched off master but 2025_final_execution is 3 commits behind master including those two related to submissions.

2025_final_execution...master

…ithub.io into 2025_webpage"

This reverts commit c414881, reversing
changes made to 061c204.
Copy link
Contributor

@bobot bobot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice job 👍 . We should perhaps start to add issues for all the todos we are adding in the code. 📋

Comment on lines -31 to -32
dst_cols = set(dst.collect_schema().names())
from_cols = set(from_.collect_schema().names())
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why do you changed to columns? I have a warning about not using columns but collect_schema().names() . Different version of polars ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@wintered wintered Aug 6, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this has been introduced by a git merge (initiated by github) that I undid in the most recent commit (2d93bab) You should no longer be getting these warnings on that commit.

@bobot
Copy link
Contributor

bobot commented Aug 6, 2025

Results is not yet in the left menu, it is perhaps on purpose. If not, it can be uncommented in hugo.toml

@bobot
Copy link
Contributor

bobot commented Aug 6, 2025

When clicking on a solver in largest-contribution, I am getting a todo /2025/results/largest-contribution-single-query/TODO. I think it was before this branch, so we can implement the link to solver in another one.

@wintered
Copy link
Contributor Author

wintered commented Aug 6, 2025

@bobot yes, we do not yet have dedicated solver pages. For now, I will disable the dead links (ed2e608)

@bobot
Copy link
Contributor

bobot commented Aug 7, 2025

Thank you for the fixes.

@wintered wintered merged commit a7e55a8 into 2025_final_execution Aug 7, 2025
5 checks passed
@wintered wintered deleted the 2025_webpage branch August 7, 2025 11:56
@bobot
Copy link
Contributor

bobot commented Aug 7, 2025

Some merge-conflict in the branch have been wrongly fixed, we have parts of 2025_final_execution that has been lost.

bobot pushed a commit to bobot/smt-comp.github.io that referenced this pull request Aug 8, 2025
* 2024 -> 2025

* target for cleaning up web results

* feat: show legends for base and non-competing only when at least one
solver present

* feat: non-competitive divisions will be marked

* skip non-competing solvers on podiums

* fix: -- -> -

* fix: missing case for determining competitive divisions

* fix: competitive solvers

* fix competitive divisions

* consistency submission vs. base solver

* refactor

* fix: ordering of solvers
bobot pushed a commit to bobot/smt-comp.github.io that referenced this pull request Aug 8, 2025
* 2024 -> 2025

* target for cleaning up web results

* feat: show legends for base and non-competing only when at least one
solver present

* feat: non-competitive divisions will be marked

* skip non-competing solvers on podiums

* fix: -- -> -

* fix: missing case for determining competitive divisions

* fix: competitive solvers

* fix competitive divisions

* consistency submission vs. base solver

* refactor

* fix: ordering of solvers
bobot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 8, 2025
* 2024 -> 2025

* target for cleaning up web results

* feat: show legends for base and non-competing only when at least one
solver present

* feat: non-competitive divisions will be marked

* skip non-competing solvers on podiums

* fix: -- -> -

* fix: missing case for determining competitive divisions

* fix: competitive solvers

* fix competitive divisions

* consistency submission vs. base solver

* refactor

* fix: ordering of solvers
bobot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2025
* 2024 -> 2025

* target for cleaning up web results

* feat: show legends for base and non-competing only when at least one
solver present

* feat: non-competitive divisions will be marked

* skip non-competing solvers on podiums

* fix: -- -> -

* fix: missing case for determining competitive divisions

* fix: competitive solvers

* fix competitive divisions

* consistency submission vs. base solver

* refactor

* fix: ordering of solvers
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants