-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34
2025 webpage #205
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
2025 webpage #205
Conversation
* bitwuzla: Change options for parallel track. Add additional configurations for lower CPU core counts. * Make additional configurations non-competitive.
…ntation-derived-solver
…ntation-derived-solver
Summary of modified submissionsSTP-Parti-Bitwuzla-16core
STP-Parti-Bitwuzla-8core
Z3-Parti-Z3pp-16core
Z3-Parti-Z3pp-32core
Z3-Parti-Z3pp-8core
Bitwuzla-16core
Bitwuzla-32core
Z3-alpha-base
|
… into 2025_webpage
|
Is it normal that the two first commits are for submissions? Are they not already in the base branch? |
|
yes, it is normal. 2025_webpage was branched off master but 2025_final_execution is 3 commits behind master including those two related to submissions. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice job 👍 . We should perhaps start to add issues for all the todos we are adding in the code. 📋
| dst_cols = set(dst.collect_schema().names()) | ||
| from_cols = set(from_.collect_schema().names()) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why do you changed to columns? I have a warning about not using columns but collect_schema().names() . Different version of polars ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this has been introduced by a git merge (initiated by github) that I undid in the most recent commit (2d93bab) You should no longer be getting these warnings on that commit.
|
|
|
When clicking on a solver in largest-contribution, I am getting a todo |
|
Thank you for the fixes. |
|
Some merge-conflict in the branch have been wrongly fixed, we have parts of 2025_final_execution that has been lost. |
* 2024 -> 2025 * target for cleaning up web results * feat: show legends for base and non-competing only when at least one solver present * feat: non-competitive divisions will be marked * skip non-competing solvers on podiums * fix: -- -> - * fix: missing case for determining competitive divisions * fix: competitive solvers * fix competitive divisions * consistency submission vs. base solver * refactor * fix: ordering of solvers
* 2024 -> 2025 * target for cleaning up web results * feat: show legends for base and non-competing only when at least one solver present * feat: non-competitive divisions will be marked * skip non-competing solvers on podiums * fix: -- -> - * fix: missing case for determining competitive divisions * fix: competitive solvers * fix competitive divisions * consistency submission vs. base solver * refactor * fix: ordering of solvers
* 2024 -> 2025 * target for cleaning up web results * feat: show legends for base and non-competing only when at least one solver present * feat: non-competitive divisions will be marked * skip non-competing solvers on podiums * fix: -- -> - * fix: missing case for determining competitive divisions * fix: competitive solvers * fix competitive divisions * consistency submission vs. base solver * refactor * fix: ordering of solvers
* 2024 -> 2025 * target for cleaning up web results * feat: show legends for base and non-competing only when at least one solver present * feat: non-competitive divisions will be marked * skip non-competing solvers on podiums * fix: -- -> - * fix: missing case for determining competitive divisions * fix: competitive solvers * fix competitive divisions * consistency submission vs. base solver * refactor * fix: ordering of solvers
Proposed changes: