-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 134
fixes inverse_exact methods for dense, yale and list stype #585
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
lib/nmatrix/math.rb
Outdated
| # * *Raises* : | ||
| # - +DataTypeError+ -> cannot invert an integer matrix in-place. | ||
| # - +NotImplementedError+ -> cannot find exact inverse of matrix with size greater than 3 # | ||
| def invert_exact! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we should probably alias this as invert_exactly! and name it exact_inverse! instead. invert_exact! is not a good name.
FYI, you can make these changes and then do a git commit -a --amend followed by a git push --force if you want to update the pull request instead of having to open a brand new one every time.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@MohawkJohn I have made the changes you asked for.
and thank you for letting me know about those command. i will keep that in mind .
lib/nmatrix/math.rb
Outdated
| # - +ShapeError+ -> matrix must be square. | ||
| # - +NotImplementedError+ -> cannot find exact inverse of matrix with size greater than 3 | ||
| # | ||
| def invert_exact |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See above comment.
|
Is that all? |
|
Wait until I'm near a computer again or get one of the other maintainers to
merge it. @v0dro, maybe?
…On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 4:45 PM Navneet Priyadarshi < ***@***.***> wrote:
what do i have to do to get this merged?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#585 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAKFpLmf0u3k524y0LbEQcYVHCx1IAx8ks5roEUBgaJpZM4MeHLF>
.
|
@MohawkJohn I have made some changes in the specs which was incorrectly done in #580 . Hope this one works. Replaces #581 #569 #444 #582 .