Skip to content

Conversation

@kevalyq
Copy link
Contributor

@kevalyq kevalyq commented Nov 15, 2025

🐛 Bug Fix: Permission Naming Conflict

Problem

Phase 3 RBAC routes (RoleController) use middleware permission:role.assign, permission:role.read, permission:role.revoke, but the seeder only created roles.assign_temporary, roles.read, etc. This caused authorization failures because the permissions didn't match.

Root Cause

Phase 3 (implemented earlier) used singular permission names:

  • role.assign (assign role to user)
  • role.read (view user's roles)
  • role.revoke (remove role from user)

Phase 4 (implemented later) used plural permission names for management:

  • roles.read (list all roles)
  • roles.create (create new role)
  • roles.update (update role)
  • roles.delete (delete role)
  • roles.assign_temporary (assign temporal role)
  • roles.extend_expiration (extend role expiration)

The seeder only created the Phase 4 permissions, leaving Phase 3 routes broken.

Solution

✅ Added both permission groups to seeder:

  • role.* permissions (3): assign, read, revoke (Phase 3)
  • roles.* permissions (6): read, create, update, delete, assign_temporary, extend_expiration (Phase 4)

✅ Updated Admin role to have both wildcards: role.* + roles.*

✅ Admin now has 40 permissions (was 37)


✨ Integration Tests

Added 8 comprehensive RBAC integration tests covering:

Test Coverage

  1. Temporal Role Lifecycle (2 tests)

    • Complete lifecycle: assign → active → expire → auto-revoke
    • Multiple temporal roles coexisting for same user
  2. Permission Inheritance (2 tests)

    • User receives combined permissions from roles + direct assignments
    • Direct permission overrides remain independent of role changes
  3. Multi-User Scenarios (1 test)

    • Vacation coverage scenario with role handoff
    • Multiple users with overlapping permissions
  4. Error Handling (3 tests)

    • Cannot assign non-existent role (404)
    • Cannot assign temporal role with invalid date range (422)
    • ⏸️ Role assignment idempotency (skipped - Phase 3 DB constraint limitation)

Test Results

  • 7 passing (40 assertions)
  • ⏸️ 1 skipped (documented Phase 3 limitation)
  • 0 failing

📝 Documentation Updates

URL Path Corrections

Fixed all API URLs from /api/v1/ to /v1/ for production API consumers:

  • README.md
  • CHANGELOG.md
  • docs/api/rbac-endpoints.md
  • docs/guides/role-management.md
  • docs/guides/permission-system.md
  • docs/guides/temporal-roles.md
  • docs/guides/direct-permissions.md
  • docs/rbac-architecture.md
  • docs/GUARD_ARCHITECTURE.md

Rationale: Production API is at https://api.secpal.app/v1/... (no /api/ prefix in URL). Internal Laravel routing uses /api/v1/, but external documentation should show the consumer-facing URL.


🧪 Testing

All Quality Gates Passing

✅ PHPStan Level Max: No errors
✅ Pint PSR-12: No issues
✅ REUSE 3.3: 180/180 files compliant
✅ Pest Tests: 277 passing (906 assertions)
   - 1 skipped (documented reason)
   - 0 failing
✅ Domain Policy: All domains use secpal.app or secpal.dev

Test Statistics

  • Before: 270 tests
  • After: 277 tests (+7 integration tests)
  • Assertions: 906 (was 866, +40)
  • Coverage: >80% for new code

📊 Changes Summary

Modified Files (10)

  • database/seeders/RolesAndPermissionsSeeder.php - Added role.* permission group
  • CHANGELOG.md - Documented bug fix under v0.2.0 "Fixed" section
  • README.md - URL corrections
  • 7x Documentation files - URL corrections

New Files (1)

  • tests/Feature/Integration/RbacIntegrationTest.php (282 lines)

Lines Changed

  • +501 insertions
  • -117 deletions
  • 618 total lines (qualifies for large-pr-approved)

🔗 Related Issues

Fixes #108 (RBAC Phase 4: Documentation & Final Testing)

Part of: Epic #5 (RBAC System)


✅ Acceptance Criteria

  • Bug fixed: Admin role now has all required permissions
  • Seeder is idempotent (uses firstOrCreate)
  • All 277 tests passing (7 new integration tests)
  • Documentation URLs corrected across 9 files
  • CHANGELOG.md updated with bug fix
  • PHPStan level max passing
  • Pint PSR-12 passing
  • REUSE 3.3 compliant
  • No breaking changes

🚀 Impact

This PR completes RBAC Phase 4 by:

  1. ✅ Fixing critical permission naming bug blocking Phase 3 routes
  2. ✅ Adding integration tests for comprehensive RBAC validation
  3. ✅ Correcting all documentation URLs for production API consumers
  4. ✅ Achieving 100% Phase 4 completion (Issue RBAC Phase 4: Documentation & Final Testing #108)

📝 Reviewer Notes

  • Large PR Warning: 618 lines changed (mostly documentation URL corrections)
  • Skip Test Reason: Phase 3 DB constraint prevents idempotent role assignment (documented with ->skip())
  • Permission Names: Both role.* and roles.* are intentional (Phase 3 vs Phase 4 compatibility)

Type: Bug Fix + Enhancement
Priority: High (blocks Phase 4 completion)
Breaking Changes: None

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings November 15, 2025 11:51
@github-actions
Copy link

💡 Tip: Consider Using Draft PRs

Benefits of opening PRs as drafts initially:

  • 💰 Saves CI runtime and Copilot review credits
  • 🎯 Automatically sets linked issues to "🚧 In Progress" status
  • 🚀 Mark "Ready for review" when done to trigger full CI pipeline

How to convert:

  1. Click "Still in progress? Convert to draft" in the sidebar, OR
  2. Use gh pr ready when ready for review

This is just a friendly reminder - feel free to continue as is! 😊

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR resolves a critical permission naming conflict between Phase 3 and Phase 4 RBAC implementations where Phase 3 routes expected role.* permissions but the seeder only created roles.* permissions. The fix adds both permission groups to enable all RBAC functionality. Additionally, comprehensive integration tests validate the complete RBAC system behavior, and documentation URLs are corrected to reflect production API paths.

Key Changes:

  • Added missing role.* permissions (assign, read, revoke) to seeder alongside existing roles.* permissions
  • Implemented 8 integration tests covering temporal role lifecycle, permission inheritance, and error handling scenarios
  • Updated API documentation URLs from /api/v1/ to /v1/ across 9 files to match production API structure

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 11 out of 11 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

Show a summary per file
File Description
database/seeders/RolesAndPermissionsSeeder.php Added role.* permission group for Phase 3 compatibility and updated Admin role wildcards
tests/Feature/Integration/RbacIntegrationTest.php New comprehensive integration test suite with 8 tests covering temporal roles, permission inheritance, and edge cases
CHANGELOG.md Documented permission naming bug fix and existing Phase 4 features under v0.2.0
docs/rbac-architecture.md Corrected API endpoint URLs from /api/v1/ to /v1/ in examples and tables
docs/guides/temporal-roles.md Updated API endpoint URLs in HTTP examples throughout the guide
docs/guides/role-management.md Fixed API endpoint URLs in code examples
docs/guides/permission-system.md Corrected API endpoint URLs in bash examples
docs/guides/direct-permissions.md Updated API endpoint URLs in HTTP request examples
docs/api/rbac-endpoints.md Corrected all endpoint URLs and cURL examples
docs/GUARD_ARCHITECTURE.md Fixed API endpoint URL in test example
README.md Updated RBAC feature section and corrected API endpoint URLs

@kevalyq kevalyq added the large-pr-approved Legitimate large PR (e.g., boilerplate templates, auto-generated code) label Nov 15, 2025
- Fix permission naming bug: Add role.* permissions (assign, read, revoke)
  for Phase 3 route compatibility alongside roles.* for Phase 4
- Update Admin role to include both permission groups (40 permissions total)
- Correct API URL paths in documentation (/api/v1/ → /v1/)
- Add 8 RBAC integration tests (7 passing, 1 skipped)
- Document bug fix in CHANGELOG.md

Fixes #108
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

Copilot reviewed 11 out of 11 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.

@kevalyq
Copy link
Contributor Author

kevalyq commented Nov 15, 2025

Copilot suggestion already implemented

The typo toHaveCountmintoHaveCount was already fixed in commit ddcaa0e.

Details:

The old review comment refers to commit 47784b2f (before the fix). Current state is 88de294 with corrected code.

@kevalyq kevalyq merged commit dc28fad into main Nov 15, 2025
16 checks passed
@kevalyq kevalyq deleted the fix/rbac-permission-naming-and-integration-tests branch November 15, 2025 12:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

large-pr-approved Legitimate large PR (e.g., boilerplate templates, auto-generated code)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

RBAC Phase 4: Documentation & Final Testing

2 participants