Skip to content

Conversation

@DhruvBhatheja
Copy link
Contributor

PR Description:

Pull Request Checklist

Overview

  • I have read and understood the CONTRIBUTING.md guidelines
  • My pull request has a descriptive title that accurately reflects the changes
  • I've included only files relevant to the changes described in the PR title and description
  • I've created a new branch in my forked repository for this contribution

Code Quality

  • My code is relevant to ServiceNow developers
  • My code snippets expand meaningfully on official ServiceNow documentation (if applicable)
  • I've disclosed use of ES2021 features (if applicable)
  • I've tested my code snippets in a ServiceNow environment (where possible)

Repository Structure Compliance

  • I've placed my code snippet(s) in one of the required top-level categories:
    • Core ServiceNow APIs/
    • Server-Side Components/
    • Client-Side Components/
    • Modern Development/
    • Integration/
    • Specialized Areas/
  • I've used appropriate sub-categories within the top-level categories
  • Each code snippet has its own folder with a descriptive name

Documentation

  • I've included a README.md file for each code snippet
  • The README.md includes:
    • Description of the code snippet functionality
    • Usage instructions or examples
    • Any prerequisites or dependencies
    • (Optional) Screenshots or diagrams if helpful

Restrictions

  • My PR does not include XML exports of ServiceNow records
  • My PR does not contain sensitive information (passwords, API keys, tokens)
  • My PR does not include changes that fall outside the described scope

@ravichandra1998g ravichandra1998g self-assigned this Oct 5, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@ravichandra1998g ravichandra1998g left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello @DhruvBhatheja
Thank you for submitting!

as a reminder, Please adhere to contributing guidelines. CONTRIBUTING.md
Expanded Snippets: Code snippets reused from the ServiceNow Documentation or API References are acceptable only if they are expanded in a meaningful way (e.g., with additional context, documentation, or variations).
Quality Over Quantity: Low-effort pull requests will be marked accordingly.
Remember: “QUANTITY IS FUN, QUALITY IS KEY.”

@ravichandra1998g ravichandra1998g added the hacktoberfest-accepted The PR is accepted for Hacktoberfest, regardless of being merged or not label Oct 5, 2025
@DhruvBhatheja
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @ravichandra1998g is this PR is acceptable?

@DhruvBhatheja
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @ravichandra1998g as I am new in this so what I explored and used in my projects these types of usecases only I have known if you have any idea what are usecases you were expected kindly tell so accordingly I will do.

@ravichandra1998g
Copy link
Contributor

For Hacktoberfest, we’re aiming for high-quality contributions providing real-world use developer cases.

You can check some of the recently merged code snippets for reference. They are good examples of what we're aiming for.

As this is your first, we are merging it.
For upcoming one's, please continue to focus on the quality enhancements

@ravichandra1998g ravichandra1998g merged commit 3b2935a into ServiceNowDevProgram:main Oct 6, 2025
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

hacktoberfest-accepted The PR is accepted for Hacktoberfest, regardless of being merged or not

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants