Skip to content

Conversation

Shashank102002
Copy link
Contributor

@Shashank102002 Shashank102002 commented Oct 13, 2025

PR Description:

replace this with your description

Pull Request Checklist

Overview

  • Put an x inside of the square brackets to check each item.
  • I have read and understood the CONTRIBUTING.md guidelines
  • My pull request has a descriptive title that accurately reflects the changes and the description has been filled in above.
  • I've included only files relevant to the changes described in the PR title and description
  • I've created a new branch in my forked repository for this contribution

Code Quality

  • My code is relevant to ServiceNow developers
  • My code snippets expand meaningfully on official ServiceNow documentation (if applicable)
  • I've disclosed use of ES2021 features (if applicable)
  • I've tested my code snippets in a ServiceNow environment (where possible)

Repository Structure Compliance

  • I've placed my code snippet(s) in one of the required top-level categories:
    • Core ServiceNow APIs/
    • Server-Side Components/
    • Client-Side Components/
    • Modern Development/
    • Integration/
    • Specialized Areas/
  • I've used appropriate sub-categories within the top-level categories
  • Each code snippet has its own folder with a descriptive name

Documentation

  • I've included a README.md file for each code snippet
  • The README.md includes:
    • Description of the code snippet functionality
    • Usage instructions or examples
    • Any prerequisites or dependencies
    • (Optional) Screenshots or diagrams if helpful

Restrictions

  • My PR does not include XML exports of ServiceNow records
  • My PR does not contain sensitive information (passwords, API keys, tokens)
  • My PR does not include changes that fall outside the described scope

@Atul-LNG Atul-LNG self-assigned this Oct 13, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@Atul-LNG Atul-LNG left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Atul-LNG
Copy link
Contributor

Atul-LNG commented Oct 13, 2025

Hi @Shashank102002

Thanks for your participation! , a few points to note:

Querying on sys_audit is not recommended, as it can negatively impact system performance.

Regarding the second point — are you referring to reassignment count based on group or the assignee?

Also, can’t we leverage metrics here instead?

@Atul-LNG Atul-LNG closed this Oct 13, 2025
@Atul-LNG Atul-LNG added the hacktoberfest-accepted The PR is accepted for Hacktoberfest, regardless of being merged or not label Oct 13, 2025
@Shashank102002
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hiii @Atul-LNG ,
Thanks for the feedback!!!
Answer to your questions :
I used sys_audit to quickly analyze reassignment trends in real time without setting up Metrics. It gives instant visibility into how often incidents get reassigned — useful for spotting process gaps or training needs. Metrics are better for large-scale tracking, but this snippet is meant for quick insights and the reassignment count here is based on the assigned_to field, focusing on how often an incident changes hands between individual assignees.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

hacktoberfest-accepted The PR is accepted for Hacktoberfest, regardless of being merged or not

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants