What research-paper workflow should become a skill next?

[ShaishavMaisuria]

Use this thread to suggest new skills or improvements for research-paper workflows. Helpful suggestions include the field, target venue or journal type, current pain point, and what a good output should look like.\n\nGood examples:\n\n- A journal-specific submission checklist for Springer, Elsevier, IEEE, ACM, Nature Portfolio, or arXiv.\n- A systematic-review screening workflow for PRISMA-style papers.\n- Better artifact/reproducibility checks for code, data, notebooks, and model cards.\n- Field-specific poster, slide, or rebuttal workflows.\n\nPlease avoid sharing private manuscripts, reviewer text, confidential data, or copyrighted paper PDFs in the discussion.