Skip to content

Conversation

@Shane32
Copy link
Owner

@Shane32 Shane32 commented Jul 6, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated and simplified GitHub Actions workflows for building, testing, and publishing by delegating tasks to external shared workflows.
    • Removed the separate build workflow and consolidated steps in the publish and test workflows.
    • Adjusted workflow triggers to include pushes to main, master, and develop branches.
    • Minor reordering and cleanup of solution file items.

@Shane32 Shane32 self-assigned this Jul 6, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 6, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@Shane32 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 7 minutes and 56 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7df4952 and a81ed89.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/tests.yml (1 hunks)
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The GitHub Actions workflows for building, testing, and publishing .NET artifacts were refactored. The custom inline steps in the workflow files were removed and replaced by jobs that invoke external reusable workflows. The build workflow was deleted, and the solution file was updated to reflect the removal of the build workflow.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.github/workflows/build.yml Deleted the entire build workflow file.
.github/workflows/publish.yml Removed detailed build/publish steps; added a single job using an external reusable workflow; expanded triggers to include pushes on main, master, and develop branches.
.github/workflows/tests.yml Removed detailed test and format jobs; added a single job using an external reusable workflow; updated triggers to include pushes on main, master, and develop branches.
Shane32.TestHelpers.sln Removed reference to build.yml; reordered solution items (README.md moved after LICENSE).

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant GitHub Actions
    participant Shared Workflows

    GitHub Actions->>Shared Workflows: Trigger build-check (tests.yml) with dotnet_folder and coveralls inputs
    Shared Workflows-->>GitHub Actions: Run build, test, coverage, and formatting checks

    GitHub Actions->>Shared Workflows: Trigger publish (publish.yml) with dotnet_folder input
    Shared Workflows-->>GitHub Actions: Run build, pack, and publish steps
Loading

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/publish.yml (1)

4-9: Watch for duplicate workflow executions on PR branches
Because both push and release remain enabled and the push trigger includes main/master/develop, any PR coming from a branch inside the same repo (e.g. develop) will fire twice: once for push and again for pull_request (in other workflows). Consider adding if: github.event_name != 'pull_request' or narrowing the push scope to avoid redundant CI minutes.

.github/workflows/tests.yml (1)

5-9: Potential double builds on internal branches
With both pull_request and push triggers including main|master|develop, PRs originating from those branches cause two identical runs. If that is unintentional, limit one trigger or gate the job with if: ${{ github.event_name == 'pull_request' }}.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0a09697 and 3266183.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • .github/workflows/build.yml (0 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/publish.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/tests.yml (1 hunks)
  • Shane32.TestHelpers.sln (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/build.yml
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Shane32.TestHelpers.sln (1)

11-13: Removal of build.yml reference looks correct
The deleted workflow entry was stale after the workflow was dropped, and the re-ordering of README.md is cosmetic only. No action required.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
.github/workflows/publish.yml (1)

14-18: Pin reusable workflow by commit SHA

The reference Shane32/SharedWorkflows/.github/workflows/publish-nuget.yml@fix_coveralls points to a branch, so upstream changes will silently alter your release process. For deterministic builds and supply-chain safety, pin this to a specific commit SHA (and let Dependabot update it).

-    uses: Shane32/SharedWorkflows/.github/workflows/publish-nuget.yml@fix_coveralls
+    # Pinned for reproducibility – update via Dependabot
+    uses: Shane32/SharedWorkflows/.github/workflows/publish-nuget.yml@<commit-sha>
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3266183 and 5852da8.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/publish.yml (1 hunks)

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 7, 2025

Coverage Report

Totals Coverage
Statements: 86.46% ( 249 / 288 )
Methods: 70% ( 42 / 60 )

@Shane32 Shane32 merged commit 5b634c1 into master Jul 7, 2025
6 checks passed
@Shane32 Shane32 deleted the update_workflows branch July 7, 2025 02:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants