Skip to content

Conversation

s-uchihori
Copy link
Contributor

@s-uchihori s-uchihori commented Apr 14, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced functionality that conditionally transforms outcomes, applying modifications to successes while preserving error states.
  • Tests
    • Expanded test coverage to confirm correct behavior for both successful and error scenarios.
  • Chores
    • Updated the package version from 0.1.2 to 0.2.0.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 14, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes update the package version in deno.json from "0.1.2" to "0.2.0". Additionally, a new function named bypass has been introduced in v0.ts to conditionally apply transformations on successful results while leaving error results unchanged. A corresponding test case in v0.test.ts verifies the behavior of the bypass function by checking its output on both success and error scenarios.

Changes

Files Change Summary
deno.json Updated package version from "0.1.2" to "0.2.0".
v0.ts, v0.test.ts Added a new bypass function in v0.ts for conditional result transformation and updated tests in v0.test.ts to verify its correct behavior for success and error cases.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
  participant Caller as Caller
  participant Bypass as bypass Function
  participant TransformFn as Transformation Function

  Caller->>Bypass: Call bypass(func)
  Note right of Bypass: Returns a function to process a result
  Caller->>Bypass: Invoke returned function with Result
  alt Result is Ok
      Bypass->>TransformFn: Apply transformation on value
      TransformFn-->>Bypass: Return transformed value
      Bypass-->>Caller: Return new Ok Result
  else Result is Err
      Bypass-->>Caller: Return original Err
  end
Loading

Poem

I'm the rabbit with a joyful hop,
Changes in code make my heart go pop!
New version shines and tests now gleam,
With bypass function, success and error beam.
Hopping through code on a digital stream! 🐇💻

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
v0.test.ts (1)

59-82: Comprehensive test coverage for the bypass function.

The test thoroughly covers the key behaviors of the bypass function:

  1. Transforming successful results with a function that returns another successful result
  2. Preserving error results
  3. Converting successful results to error results

The test cases demonstrate all important aspects of the function's behavior.

Consider adding explicit assertions for the result types using assert(isOk(bypassedOkResult)) and assert(isErr(bypassedErrResult)) before checking their values. This would make the tests more robust by ensuring the correct result type is returned in each case.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 56c8ec1 and a7ede72.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • deno.json (1 hunks)
  • v0.test.ts (2 hunks)
  • v0.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
v0.test.ts (1)
v0.ts (6)
  • Result (47-47)
  • ok (60-60)
  • err (73-73)
  • bypass (127-133)
  • isOk (90-90)
  • isErr (107-108)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
deno.json (1)

7-7: Version bump appropriately reflects the functional changes.

The version update from 0.1.2 to 0.2.0 properly follows semantic versioning principles, reflecting the addition of new functionality (the bypass function) without breaking existing APIs.

v0.ts (1)

109-133: Well-implemented bypass function with thorough documentation.

The bypass function is well designed with comprehensive JSDoc comments that clearly explain its purpose, parameters, return value, and include helpful usage examples. The type signature accurately captures that error types can come from either the input (PreviousNg) or from the transformation function (NextNg).

The implementation is concise and follows functional programming principles by preserving the error state and only applying transformations to successful results.

v0.test.ts (1)

1-1: Import statement updated to include the new bypass function.

The import statement has been properly updated to include the newly added bypass function.

@Showichiro Showichiro merged commit 195022a into Showichiro:main Apr 14, 2025
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants