Field masks cleanup #198
Merged
Field masks cleanup #198
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
Author
|
@armiol PTAL |
Current coverage is 80.23% (diff: 0.00%)
@@ stand-in-memory #198 diff @@
=================================================
Files 147 145 -2
Lines 5438 5394 -44
Methods 0 0
Messages 0 0
Branches 602 595 -7
=================================================
- Hits 4369 4328 -41
+ Misses 959 957 -2
+ Partials 110 109 -1
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No coverage improvement can be provided for
FieldMasksat the moment sincecatchblocks are not to be executed within the standard flow. The only possibility I see for those pieces of code to be run is if the protobuf definitions are compiled improperly.