Private in documentation

[fortmarek]

Hi!
first off, thanks for this tool, it's really awesome so far!
I have just come across one issue - I am not sure if it is a bug or a known limitation - but if I generate the documentation, it also creates a documentation for private methods (if they appear in public class).
When I looked through the source code, it really does seem that there is filter for types, but not their properties themselves.

For example:
This function is private but it appears in the generated documentation

[mattt]

Thanks for reaching out, @fortmarek. I recently merged a refactoring of how symbol relationships are encoded, which may caused a few regressions. (Fortunately, now that I have a sense of what the behavior should be, I can finally start writing tests to help catch these kinds of problems).

Taking a look at this now.

[mattt]

Alright, I was able to reproduce this behavior without a problem. The fix appears to be straightforward, too (3af57a6). This should be resolved in the 0.0.3 release.

When you have a chance, please re-run your workflow and confirm that everything is working as expected.

[fortmarek]

Thanks for the quick response, that has done the trick!

[mattt]

Awesome. So glad to hear it, @fortmarek! Thanks again for reporting this.