Skip to content

Conversation

@maximgorbatyuk
Copy link
Member

@maximgorbatyuk maximgorbatyuk commented Apr 27, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Added a validation summary to the multi-step salary form, displaying a grouped list of invalid fields by page when errors are present.
  • Style
    • Updated form container padding for improved layout and appearance.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 27, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes introduce enhanced validation feedback to a multi-step salary form. The HTML template now displays a validation summary alert in steps one and three, listing invalid fields grouped by page, using a new getInvalidFields() method from the form class. The EditSalaryForm class is extended to track invalid fields, group them by page, and provide user-friendly labels in Russian. New methods and interfaces are added to support this functionality, but no existing logic or control flow is altered outside of the validation summary feature. Additionally, a test script in package.json was updated to disable watch mode during headless testing, a minor formatting change was made in src/test.ts, and GitHub Actions workflow actions were upgraded to newer versions.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
src/app/modules/salaries/components/add-salary/add-salary.component.html Updated form container padding classes; added validation summary blocks to steps 1 and 3 of the form.
src/app/modules/salaries/components/add-salary/edit-salary-form.ts Extended EditSalaryForm to track invalid fields, group them by page, provide user-friendly labels, and expose a new getInvalidFields() method. Added supporting interfaces and helper methods.
package.json Modified "test-headless-ci-only" script to add --no-watch flag for Angular CLI test command.
src/test.ts Added a blank line after the context constant declaration; no logic changes.
.github/workflows/test.yml Upgraded actions/checkout and actions/cache from version 2 to version 4 in the test workflow.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant AddSalaryComponent
    participant EditSalaryForm

    User->>AddSalaryComponent: Interacts with salary form (multi-step)
    AddSalaryComponent->>EditSalaryForm: Submit or validate form
    EditSalaryForm->>EditSalaryForm: Check validity, collect invalid fields
    EditSalaryForm->>AddSalaryComponent: getInvalidFields() returns grouped invalid fields
    AddSalaryComponent->>User: Display validation summary alert with invalid fields by page
Loading

Poem

In the garden of forms where salaries grow,
A rabbit hops by, validation in tow.
Now fields out of place are easy to see,
Grouped by each page, as clear as can be!
With Russian labels and warnings that show,
Filling your form is less of a woe.
🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 35edaeb and 60d6503.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/test.yml (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/test.yml

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
src/app/modules/salaries/components/add-salary/edit-salary-form.ts (3)

223-249: Consider making page count more dynamic.

The method correctly groups invalid fields by page, but it hardcodes exactly three pages. This might cause issues if the form structure changes in the future.

Consider making the page count dynamic:

-    const groupedByPage: InvalidFieldsGroupedByPage[] = [
-      {
-        page: 1,
-        fields: [],
-      },
-      {
-        page: 2,
-        fields: [],
-      },
-      {
-        page: 3,
-        fields: [],
-      },
-    ];
+    // Get the maximum page number
+    const maxPage = Math.max(...this._invalidFields.map(field => field.page));
+    
+    // Create an array of pages from 1 to maxPage
+    const groupedByPage: InvalidFieldsGroupedByPage[] = Array.from(
+      { length: maxPage },
+      (_, i) => ({
+        page: i + 1,
+        fields: [],
+      })
+    );

251-251: Fix typo in method name.

There's a typo in the method name - it should be "Label" not "Lable".

-  private getControlNameLable(name: string): string {
+  private getControlNameLabel(name: string): string {

Don't forget to update the reference to this method in createAddRequestOrNull() as well.


279-300: Consider adding a comment about the default case.

The method correctly assigns controls to form pages, but the default return of 0 might be confusing. Consider adding a comment explaining this case.

       default:
+        // Return 0 for unknown fields as a fallback
         return 0;
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c971ac7 and 1a3ac3d.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/app/modules/salaries/components/add-salary/add-salary.component.html (2 hunks)
  • src/app/modules/salaries/components/add-salary/edit-salary-form.ts (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
src/app/modules/salaries/components/add-salary/edit-salary-form.ts (3)

14-23: Well-structured interfaces for invalid fields tracking.

The interfaces provide clear typing for tracking invalid fields in the multi-step form. InvalidFieldsGroupedByPage allows grouping invalid fields by page, which is useful for providing feedback at different stages of the form completion.


28-28: Good initialization of the invalid fields tracking array.

The private property is correctly initialized as an empty array to store invalid fields when form validation fails.


160-171: Good implementation of invalid fields tracking logic.

This code correctly collects information about invalid form controls, including their page, control name, and user-friendly label when form validation fails.

src/app/modules/salaries/components/add-salary/add-salary.component.html (2)

5-5: Improved responsive padding.

The change from "card-body form-container" to "card-body p-lg-5 p-3" provides better responsive padding (larger on desktop, smaller on mobile), improving UI consistency.


292-313: Well-implemented validation summary alert.

This validation summary block is a good addition that:

  • Only displays when there are invalid fields
  • Clearly shows which fields need attention, grouped by page
  • Uses nested numbering for better organization

This will greatly improve user experience by providing clear feedback about validation issues across the multi-step form.

Comment on lines +292 to +313
<div class="mb-3" *ngIf="addSalaryForm.getInvalidFields().length > 0">
<div class="alert alert-warning">
<div class="mb-2">
<strong>Внимание!</strong> Следующие поля не заполнены:
</div>
<div
class="mb-2"
*ngFor="
let field of addSalaryForm.getInvalidFields();
let i = index
"
>
<div>{{ i + 1 }}. Страница {{ field.page }}</div>
<div
class="ms-3"
*ngFor="let control of field.fields; let j = index"
>
{{ i + 1 }}.{{ j + 1 }}. {{ control }}
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Missing validation summary for the first step.

The validation summary alert is only implemented for the third step of the form. According to the AI summary, it should be present on both the first and third steps to provide consistent feedback.

Add the same validation summary block to the first step of the form (around line 145, before the "Далее" button):

+          <div class="mb-3" *ngIf="addSalaryForm.getInvalidFields().length > 0">
+            <div class="alert alert-warning">
+              <div class="mb-2">
+                <strong>Внимание!</strong> Следующие поля не заполнены:
+              </div>
+              <div
+                class="mb-2"
+                *ngFor="
+                  let field of addSalaryForm.getInvalidFields();
+                  let i = index
+                "
+              >
+                <div>{{ i + 1 }}. Страница {{ field.page }}</div>
+                <div
+                  class="ms-3"
+                  *ngFor="let control of field.fields; let j = index"
+                >
+                  {{ i + 1 }}.{{ j + 1 }}. {{ control }}
+                </div>
+              </div>
+            </div>
+          </div>
+
           <div class="row mt-5">
             <div class="col-6"></div>
             <div class="col-6">

@maximgorbatyuk maximgorbatyuk merged commit 04372de into main Apr 27, 2025
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants