Skip to content

Conversation

@AdvancedImagingUTSW
Copy link
Collaborator

Check to see if model has attribute signal_container before trying to reset it.

Otherwise, reset the feature list...

Slight refactor to hopefully make the logic more obvious. Please doublecheck.

Check to see if model has attribute signal_container before trying to reset it.

Otherwise, reset the feature list...

Slight refactor to hopefully make the logic more obvious. Please doublecheck.
@AdvancedImagingUTSW AdvancedImagingUTSW linked an issue May 11, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 11, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 51.07%. Comparing base (91269ab) to head (a999dcb).
Report is 4 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop     #885   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    51.07%   51.07%           
========================================
  Files          178      178           
  Lines        19026    19027    +1     
========================================
+ Hits          9717     9718    +1     
  Misses        9309     9309           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 51.07% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@AdvancedImagingUTSW
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Difficult to test since it was a low-frequency error, but everything did seem to run as anticipated.

@AdvancedImagingUTSW AdvancedImagingUTSW merged commit f1a9291 into develop May 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Low-Frequency Error with Signal Container

3 participants