Skip to content

Conversation

@deepsource-autofix
Copy link
Contributor

This PR refactors a redundant boolean comparison to improve code conciseness and readability.

  • Consider simplifying the boolean comparison expression for concision: The code originally used errors.Any() == true, which is an unnecessary comparison. We replaced it with the direct call errors.Any(), removing the redundant == true check and making the conditional more straightforward.

This Autofix was generated by AI. Please review the change before merging.

This PR refactors a redundant boolean comparison to improve code conciseness and readability.

- Consider simplifying the boolean comparison expression for concision: The code originally used `errors.Any() == true`, which is an unnecessary comparison. We replaced it with the direct call `errors.Any()`, removing the redundant `== true` check and making the conditional more straightforward.

> This Autofix was generated by AI. Please review the change before merging.
@deepsource-io
Copy link

deepsource-io bot commented Sep 18, 2025

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits 5b5c127..e5c5753. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

AnalyzerStatusSummaryLink
DeepSource C# LogoC#✅ Success
🎯 1 occurence resolved
View Check ↗
DeepSource Docker LogoDocker✅ SuccessView Check ↗
DeepSource JavaScript LogoJavaScript✅ SuccessView Check ↗
DeepSource SQL LogoSQL✅ SuccessView Check ↗

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

@StuartFerguson StuartFerguson merged commit 63ca34f into main Sep 18, 2025
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants