Match new Libtask to v0.2

[FredericWantiez]

Just moving the changes in #35 to match the last release.

[FredericWantiez]

@yebai Had a look at the test in Turing for the new Libtask, seems like the breaking part is here:
https://github.com/TuringLang/Turing.jl/blob/60b7d3f2328904c4e0d88a974cc97eb752c2bb95/src/inference/AdvancedSMC.jl#L354
When DynamicPPL expands observe that creates a nested produce. Not too familiar with the way DynamicPPL works and how to patch it with

function (instr::Libtask.Instruction{}))
end

[yebai]

thanks @FredericWantiez, it looks like the same issue that we met in #35 . @KDr2 can you create a PR for Turing to address the issue?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #36 (cefe010) into releases (350e2c1) will increase coverage by 0.42%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##           releases      #36      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     55.70%   56.13%   +0.42%     
============================================
  Files             5        5              
  Lines           368      367       -1     
============================================
+ Hits            205      206       +1     
+ Misses          163      161       -2     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/container.jl	93.91% <100.00%> (+1.29%)	⬆️
src/model.jl	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 350e2c1...cefe010. Read the comment docs.

[yebai]

@KDr2 It seems some tests hang on Julia 1.3. Could you take a look, please?

[KDr2]

I am on it now. Seems that on Julia 1.3, we got one time more consuming than it is on 1.7:

v1.7:

("consumer -> start!", ttask.task) = ("consumer -> start!", Task (runnable) @0x00007fbda79f1cd0)
("consumer -> take!", ttask.task) = ("consumer -> take!", Task (runnable) @0x00007fbda79f1cd0)
("producer -> put!", current_task()) = ("producer -> put!", Task (runnable) @0x00007fbda79f1cd0)
("producer -> take!", current_task()) = ("producer -> take!", Task (runnable) @0x00007fbda79f1cd0)
("consumer -> put!", ttask.task) = ("consumer -> put!", Task (runnable) @0x00007fbda79f1cd0)
("producer -> put!", current_task()) = ("producer -> put!", Task (runnable) @0x00007fbda79f1cd0)
("consumer -> take!", ttask.task) = ("consumer -> take!", Task (runnable) @0x00007fbda79f1cd0)
("producer -> take!", current_task()) = ("producer -> take!", Task (runnable) @0x00007fbda79f1cd0)

v1.3:

("consumer -> start!", ttask.task) = ("consumer -> start!", Task (runnable) @0x00007f47b7004010)
("consumer -> take!", ttask.task) = ("consumer -> take!", Task (runnable) @0x00007f47b7004010)
("producer -> put!", current_task()) = ("producer -> put!", Task (runnable) @0x00007f47b7004010)
("producer -> take!", current_task()) = ("producer -> take!", Task (runnable) @0x00007f47b7004010)
("consumer -> put!", ttask.task) = ("consumer -> put!", Task (runnable) @0x00007f47b7004010)
("producer -> put!", current_task()) = ("producer -> put!", Task (runnable) @0x00007f47b7004010)
("consumer -> take!", ttask.task) = ("consumer -> take!", Task (runnable) @0x00007f47b7004010)
("producer -> take!", current_task()) = ("producer -> take!", Task (runnable) @0x00007f47b7004010)
("consumer -> put!", ttask.task) = ("consumer -> put!", Task (runnable) @0x00007f47b7004010)
("consumer -> take!", ttask.task) = ("consumer -> take!", Task (runnable) @0x00007f47b7004010)

[KDr2]

@yebai Had a look at the test in Turing for the new Libtask, seems like the breaking part is here: https://github.com/TuringLang/Turing.jl/blob/60b7d3f2328904c4e0d88a974cc97eb752c2bb95/src/inference/AdvancedSMC.jl#L354 When DynamicPPL expands observe that creates a nested produce. Not too familiar with the way DynamicPPL works and how to patch it with

function (instr::Libtask.Instruction{}))
end

I ran test cases of Turing, and all of them have passed. Had some awesome guys already fixed them?
Here are the packages I used:

(Turing) pkg> status
Project Turing v0.19.1
    Status `~/Work/julia/Turing.jl/Project.toml`
  [80f14c24] AbstractMCMC v3.2.1
  [0bf59076] AdvancedHMC v0.3.2
  [5b7e9947] AdvancedMH v0.6.6
  [576499cb] AdvancedPS v0.2.4
  [b5ca4192] AdvancedVI v0.1.3
  [198e06fe] BangBang v0.3.32
  [76274a88] Bijectors v0.9.11
  [864edb3b] DataStructures v0.18.11
  [31c24e10] Distributions v0.25.36
  [ced4e74d] DistributionsAD v0.6.34
  [ffbed154] DocStringExtensions v0.8.6
  [366bfd00] DynamicPPL v0.16.2
  [cad2338a] EllipticalSliceSampling v0.4.4
  [f6369f11] ForwardDiff v0.10.24
  [6f1fad26] Libtask v0.5.3 [`../Libtask.jl`]
  [c7f686f2] MCMCChains v5.0.1
  [86f7a689] NamedArrays v0.9.6
  [189a3867] Reexport v1.2.2
  [ae029012] Requires v1.1.3
  [0bca4576] SciMLBase v1.13.6
  [276daf66] SpecialFunctions v1.8.1
  [2913bbd2] StatsBase v0.33.13
  [4c63d2b9] StatsFuns v0.9.14
  [9f7883ad] Tracker v0.2.16
  [700de1a5] ZygoteRules v0.2.2
  [37e2e46d] LinearAlgebra
  [de0858da] Printf
  [9a3f8284] Random
  [10745b16] Statistics

[KDr2]

@KDr2 It seems some tests hang on Julia 1.3. Could you take a look, please?

I think this commit TuringLang/Libtask.jl@0334a49 would fix it.