You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
most discovery happens on google maps, instagram, and aggregators like zomato / swiggy — but there is no shared playbook per channel
spend rises while message stays generic
competitor opacity
nearby brands look “busier” or better rated; why is unclear
copying the wrong tactic burns margin
data overload, zero motion
reviews, ratings, and social chatter exist in fragments
almost impossible to turn raw text into next week’s actions
manual marketing
promos, captions, and campaigns are inconsistent and guess-based
teams react late; winners compound small advantages daily
consequences (industry narrative)
signal
typical interpretation (not a guarantee for any one venue)
revenue leakage
operators under-optimize discovery and repeat purchase — decks often cite ~30–40% “left on the table” when positioning and ops are misaligned
survival curve
high early churn in food — narratives often cite ~60% of restaurants struggling in the first ~3 years without disciplined marketing + ops feedback loops
use these figures in pitches as directional industry framing, not as promises baked into the software.
who is it for?
persona
situation
what they need
independent owners & cloud kitchens
uneven visibility; lean marketing headcount
repeatable digital rhythm without hiring a full analytics team
multi-outlet brands & growing chains
every location has its own reviews and competitors
structured competitor and sentiment intelligence that scales
marketing teams & food / beverage agencies
too many tabs, too few defensible insights
automated campaign scaffolding and data-backed proof for clients
main outcomes for the user (what “good” looks like)
outcome
mechanism (product)
deck-style uplift (directional)
sharper competitive positioning
hyperlocal benchmarking + framework outputs (where data exists)
decks often target ~2–3× clarity vs guessing from screenshots alone
revenue & margin discipline
tie fixes to themes in reviews + prioritized recommendations
literature commonly cites ~5–40% upside bands when positioning and retention improve — your mileage varies
marketing efficiency
fewer one-off brainstorms; more prompts grounded in customer language
less time per campaign cycle
social traction
captions, ideas, and automations derived from trend + sentiment signals
teams often aim for up to ~2× engagement lift when content matches proven themes
less manual grind
pipelines + queues handle heavy fetch and nlp
planners focus on approval, not copy-paste
better acquisition
messaging aligned to high-intent complaints and praise
fewer wasted promos
our solution (what feels new or better)
pillar
what evara does
why it beats “another dashboard”
framework-driven intelligence
turns reviews + social signals into swot, pestel, bcg matrix, and 4ps (marketing mix) via dedicated routes and workers — not only charts
leadership gets strategy language, not only star averages
hyperlocal competitor lens
compares you to nearby competitive reality (where scrape + profile data support it)
benchmarks match who actually steals your walk-ins
end-to-end decision support
moves from signal → insight → recommendations → optional automation (e.g. instagram-oriented flows)
fewer dead-end reports
execution-ready marketing
surfaces content ideas, captions, hashtags, and weekly-style plans driven by live context
instagram content packs, weekly plans, optional simli video agent flows
9 — observe
dashboard (frontend/)
heatmaps, competitor panels, trend charts
10 — alert
(your channel)
spikes / drops trigger playbooks
impact metrics (what investors & operators track)
treat the numeric bands as north-star ranges from typical food / beverage + growth literature and your pitch deck — not automated guarantees from this codebase.
lever
indicative range
how evara supports measurement
customer acquisition
40–60% uplift narratives in strong ai-marketing case studies
tie campaigns back to tracked links + promo codes in your ops
revenue / positioning
25–40% bands appear in positioning case studies
before/after same-store metrics
marketing efficiency
30–50% less effort when automation covers drafts
time logs per campaign
social engagement
~2× on reach / likes / shares when creative matches extracted topics
native analytics + our content hooks
ratings & sentiment
20–30% improvement stories after sustained fixes
rolling review scrape + sentiment dashboards
competitive rank
track local rank vs chosen peer set
competitor analytics routes
tech stack (truthful to this repo)
layer
technology
frontend
react, typescript, vite, tailwind — frontend/
api
node.js, fastify, typescript — backend/api/
database
postgresql via supabase
queues / cache
redis, bullmq
scraping
apify actors + normalisers
ai
google gemini (gemini-2.5-flash, text-embedding-004) — server-side @google/generative-ai
your architecture diagrams may show langchain / openai / claude; this branch’s api path is gemini-first with room to add more providers behind the same route patterns.
we don’t just analyze restaurants — we help them grow smarter, faster, and more profitably.
About
AI-native marketing & business intelligence for the F&B industry. Automatically transforms reviews from Google, Zomato, Swiggy, and Instagram into actionable strategy frameworks (SWOT, PESTEL) and confidence-ranked recommendations.