test: Add Ackermann function #6
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Valentin Ilie <valentin.ilie@intel.com>
|
lgtm |
Member
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
On 17 August 2015 at 01:21, Dan Gohman notifications@github.com wrote:
In README.md
#6 (comment):@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ This repository holds the official specifications and reference implementations
for WebAssembly.At this time, the contents of this repository are under development and known
-to be incomplet and inkorrect.These typos had been intentional, referencing a somewhat
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2015/n4399.html
common
http://gambit-list.iro.umontreal.narkive.com/cJycey10/incomplet-and-or-inkorrect-implementation-of-srfi-9
tradition (which is also a little humorous) in specs.
Good point. Reinstated.
/Andreas
eqrion
pushed a commit
to eqrion/wasm-spec
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 18, 2019
I think it's a better name than `set`, especially considering we may have a `table.set` in the future, which will likely set just one value. It also follows naming of [Array.prototype.fill](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Array/fill) which has similar behavior.
dhil
pushed a commit
to dhil/webassembly-spec
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 2, 2023
Rewrite to match suggestions from issues and feedback.
dhil
pushed a commit
to dhil/webassembly-spec
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 2, 2023
dhil
added a commit
to dhil/webassembly-spec
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 20, 2023
Merge with WebAssembly/spec
rossberg
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 6, 2024
CharlieTap
pushed a commit
to CharlieTap/spec
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 25, 2025
This commit is an attempt to summarize the discussion in WebAssembly#6 and write it up in the overview. I've updated various sections and added a new section about `add_wide3` as well. The tl;dr; is that the proposal is still going to exclusively support `i64.add128` and `i64.sub128` to defer `i64.add_wide3` to a theoretical future where `i1` is a native WebAssembly type. Closes WebAssembly#6 Closes WebAssembly#34
stevenfontanella
pushed a commit
to stevenfontanella/spec
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 12, 2025
Update repos
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Signed-off-by: Valentin Ilie valentin.ilie@intel.com