Skip to content

Conversation

@rpoisel
Copy link
Contributor

@rpoisel rpoisel commented Nov 9, 2016

Hi,

I added instructions for building CPack packages from this CMake configuration. Furthermore, I also made the compilation of unit-tests optional.

The problem I have with CMake's ExternalProject-module is that it does not play well with cross-compilation (a.k.a. CMake toolchain files). Therefore I added two new definitions (LIBWEBSOCKETS_INCLUDE_DIRS and LIBWEBSOCKETS_LIBRARIES) that allow for overriding the results of find_package(LibWebSockets).

This is just a proposal, so feel free to make any counterproposals. :-)

@rpoisel rpoisel force-pushed the cpackage branch 2 times, most recently from de3a457 to ba15da0 Compare November 9, 2016 11:42
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 97.547% when pulling de3a457 on rpoisel:cpackage into 9f4f9a0 on WebProcessControl:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 97.547% when pulling ba15da0 on rpoisel:cpackage into 9f4f9a0 on WebProcessControl:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 97.547% when pulling 3ceb105 on rpoisel:cpackage into 9f4f9a0 on WebProcessControl:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 97.547% when pulling ccb0f22 on rpoisel:cpackage into 9f4f9a0 on WebProcessControl:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 97.547% when pulling 776c0bf on rpoisel:cpackage into 9f4f9a0 on WebProcessControl:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 97.547% when pulling 2befee0 on rpoisel:cpackage into 9f4f9a0 on WebProcessControl:master.

@paroga paroga force-pushed the master branch 2 times, most recently from 114b89e to 0aae3d1 Compare November 14, 2016 10:32
@paroga
Copy link
Member

paroga commented Nov 14, 2016

Thanks for the PR. I cherry-picked most of your changes and pushed them to master.

@paroga paroga closed this Nov 14, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants