Skip to content

Conversation

@R1shabh-Gupta
Copy link

@github-actions
Copy link

Test using WordPress Playground

The changes in this pull request can previewed and tested using a WordPress Playground instance.

WordPress Playground is an experimental project that creates a full WordPress instance entirely within the browser.

Some things to be aware of

  • The Plugin and Theme Directories cannot be accessed within Playground.
  • All changes will be lost when closing a tab with a Playground instance.
  • All changes will be lost when refreshing the page.
  • A fresh instance is created each time the link below is clicked.
  • Every time this pull request is updated, a new ZIP file containing all changes is created. If changes are not reflected in the Playground instance,
    it's possible that the most recent build failed, or has not completed. Check the list of workflow runs to be sure.

For more details about these limitations and more, check out the Limitations page in the WordPress Playground documentation.

Test this pull request with WordPress Playground.

@R1shabh-Gupta R1shabh-Gupta marked this pull request as ready for review August 20, 2025 07:48
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 20, 2025

The following accounts have interacted with this PR and/or linked issues. I will continue to update these lists as activity occurs. You can also manually ask me to refresh this list by adding the props-bot label.

Core Committers: Use this line as a base for the props when committing in SVN:

Props rishabhwp, wildworks, isabel_brison.

To understand the WordPress project's expectations around crediting contributors, please review the Contributor Attribution page in the Core Handbook.

Copy link
Contributor

@tellthemachines tellthemachines left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! We could remove the regression test as I mentioned below, but that's not a dealbreaker.

*
* @dataProvider data_layout_classname_with_core_blocks
*/
public function test_layout_classname_works_for_core_blocks( $block_name, $layout_type, $expected_class, $should_not_contain ) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We don't really need this test because we already test classnames output for core blocks here.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Removed in 7e234f0

@tellthemachines
Copy link
Contributor

Not sure why the tests are failing on CI; they pass for me locally.

@t-hamano
Copy link
Contributor

t-hamano commented Nov 7, 2025

@tellthemachines, I merged the latest trunk branch into this branch. Hopefully, this will resolve the test failure.

@t-hamano
Copy link
Contributor

t-hamano commented Nov 7, 2025

@tellthemachines, it seems the CI failure has been fixed. If you have the bandwidth, please feel free to commit!

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 7, 2025

A commit was made that fixes the Trac ticket referenced in the description of this pull request.

SVN changeset: 61175
GitHub commit: 6680408

This PR will be closed, but please confirm the accuracy of this and reopen if there is more work to be done.

@github-actions github-actions bot closed this Nov 7, 2025
@tellthemachines
Copy link
Contributor

Done, thanks for the updates @t-hamano !

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants