Skip to content

Conversation

@travissanderson-wf
Copy link
Contributor

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

might be better to implement hints as an option instead of a flag with values of 'none', 'enabled', 'fatal'?

@codecov-io
Copy link

Current coverage is 45.12%

Merging #102 into master will not affect coverage as of 475340a

Powered by Codecov. Updated on successful CI builds.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

might be better to implement hints as an option instead of a flag with values of 'none', 'enabled', 'fatal'?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm torn on this. I think I like that idea, but it could be confusing to make --hints function differently than the dartanalyzer.

@evanweible-wf
Copy link
Contributor

+1

1 similar comment
@maxwellpeterson-wf
Copy link
Member

+1

@trentgrover-wf
Copy link
Contributor

+1
@jayudey-wf ready for merge

@jayudey-wf jayudey-wf changed the title Initial implementation of failing on analyzer hints CP-1140 Initial implementation of failing on analyzer hints Nov 24, 2015
@jayudey-wf
Copy link
Contributor

@travissanderson-wf can you update the readme with this change as well potentially provide an integration test (@evanweible-wf your thoughts on the latter) ?

@travissanderson-wf
Copy link
Contributor Author

There was no existing coverage over AnalyzeTask so I didn't add any

@travissanderson-wf
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jayudey-wf added the README info!

@travissanderson-wf
Copy link
Contributor Author

I misunderstood the analyze_test - I will add coverage!

@travissanderson-wf
Copy link
Contributor Author

@evanweible-wf @maxwellpeterson-wf @trentgrover-wf @jayudey-wf ready for review again

@evanweible-wf
Copy link
Contributor

Code looks good, +1 assuming CI passes. At that point, I think this is ready for a rebase against latest master and a squash into a single commit.

@travissanderson-wf travissanderson-wf force-pushed the fatal_hints branch 2 times, most recently from f6feeaa to 7cfa4ff Compare November 24, 2015 17:06
@travissanderson-wf
Copy link
Contributor Author

@evanweible-wf done

@evanweible-wf
Copy link
Contributor

+1

1 similar comment
@maxwellpeterson-wf
Copy link
Member

+1

@trentgrover-wf
Copy link
Contributor

+1
@jayudey-wf ready for merge

@evanweible-wf
Copy link
Contributor

@travissanderson-wf needs a ddev format 😦

@travissanderson-wf
Copy link
Contributor Author

sigh... done

@trentgrover-wf
Copy link
Contributor

🎉 +1

@jayudey-wf
Copy link
Contributor

QA Resource Approval: +10

  • Testing instruction (derived from issue)
  • Dev +1's
  • Dev/QA +10 with detail of what was tested
    • tests cover new functionality
  • Unit test created/updated
  • All unit tests pass

Merging into master.

jayudey-wf added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 24, 2015
CP-1140 Initial implementation of failing on analyzer hints
@jayudey-wf jayudey-wf merged commit d89d105 into Workiva:master Nov 24, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants