-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 75
feat: Add relayer repayment address #653
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
a2e4842
41bd6c0
fee79f3
7b9cd50
fa1d38f
e3b320c
7f31b38
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ pub fn execute_v3_slow_relay_leaf( | |
| fill_deadline: relay_data.fill_deadline, | ||
| exclusivity_deadline: relay_data.exclusivity_deadline, | ||
| exclusive_relayer: relay_data.exclusive_relayer, | ||
| relayer: *ctx.accounts.signer.key, | ||
| relayer: Pubkey::default(), // There is no repayment address for slow | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Question: Why are we moving from the relayer public key to address_zero here? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think we had it wrong and EVM implementation passes empty address as well |
||
| depositor: relay_data.depositor, | ||
| recipient: relay_data.recipient, | ||
| message: relay_data.message, | ||
|
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
^
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Very odd 🤔