Skip to content

Conversation

@grasphoper
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Signed-off-by: Ihor Farion <ihor@umaproject.org>
@socket-security
Copy link

Warning

Review the following alerts detected in dependencies.

According to your organization's Security Policy, it is recommended to resolve "Warn" alerts. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗.

Action Severity Alert (click for details)
Warn Critical
@openzeppelin/contracts@4.1.0 has a Critical CVE.

CVE: GHSA-5vp3-v4hc-gx76 UUPSUpgradeable vulnerability in @openzeppelin/contracts (CRITICAL)

Affected versions: >= 4.1.0, < 4.3.2

Patched version: 4.3.2

Source: yarn.lock

ℹ Read more on: This package | This alert | What is a critical CVE?

Next steps: Take a moment to review the security alert above. Review the linked package source code to understand the potential risk. Ensure the package is not malicious before proceeding. If you're unsure how to proceed, reach out to your security team or ask the Socket team for help at support@socket.dev.

Suggestion: Remove or replace dependencies that include known critical CVEs. Consumers can use dependency overrides or npm audit fix --force to remove vulnerable dependencies.

Mark the package as acceptable risk. To ignore this alert only in this pull request, reply with the comment @SocketSecurity ignore npm/@openzeppelin/contracts@4.1.0. You can also ignore all packages with @SocketSecurity ignore-all. To ignore an alert for all future pull requests, use Socket's Dashboard to change the triage state of this alert.

Warn Critical
@openzeppelin/contracts@4.1.0 has a Critical CVE.

CVE: GHSA-fg47-3c2x-m2wr TimelockController vulnerability in OpenZeppelin Contracts (CRITICAL)

Affected versions: >= 4.0.0, < 4.3.1

Patched version: 4.3.1

Source: yarn.lock

ℹ Read more on: This package | This alert | What is a critical CVE?

Next steps: Take a moment to review the security alert above. Review the linked package source code to understand the potential risk. Ensure the package is not malicious before proceeding. If you're unsure how to proceed, reach out to your security team or ask the Socket team for help at support@socket.dev.

Suggestion: Remove or replace dependencies that include known critical CVEs. Consumers can use dependency overrides or npm audit fix --force to remove vulnerable dependencies.

Mark the package as acceptable risk. To ignore this alert only in this pull request, reply with the comment @SocketSecurity ignore npm/@openzeppelin/contracts@4.1.0. You can also ignore all packages with @SocketSecurity ignore-all. To ignore an alert for all future pull requests, use Socket's Dashboard to change the triage state of this alert.

Warn Critical
babel-traverse@6.26.0 has a Critical CVE.

CVE: GHSA-67hx-6x53-jw92 Babel vulnerable to arbitrary code execution when compiling specifically crafted malicious code (CRITICAL)

Affected versions: < 7.23.2

Patched version: No patched versions

Source: yarn.lock

ℹ Read more on: This package | This alert | What is a critical CVE?

Next steps: Take a moment to review the security alert above. Review the linked package source code to understand the potential risk. Ensure the package is not malicious before proceeding. If you're unsure how to proceed, reach out to your security team or ask the Socket team for help at support@socket.dev.

Suggestion: Remove or replace dependencies that include known critical CVEs. Consumers can use dependency overrides or npm audit fix --force to remove vulnerable dependencies.

Mark the package as acceptable risk. To ignore this alert only in this pull request, reply with the comment @SocketSecurity ignore npm/babel-traverse@6.26.0. You can also ignore all packages with @SocketSecurity ignore-all. To ignore an alert for all future pull requests, use Socket's Dashboard to change the triage state of this alert.

View full report ↗

@grasphoper grasphoper merged commit 1c5d663 into master Apr 11, 2025
9 checks passed
@grasphoper grasphoper deleted the if/bump-package-version-to-407 branch April 11, 2025 17:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants