Skip to content

undef and todo #72

@eelstork

Description

@eelstork

For top down design undef() should be useful but, although how it is designed makes sense in theory in practice I do not find a use.

  • A default of failing vs dithering between values would make more sense.
  • An option to assign a fixed value would be good.

The dithering model may go away. Until then provide options as above.

todo proposed as a variant. undef is designed to break production builds (no change). todo would issue a warning instead.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or request

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions