Skip to content

Conversation

@Zblocker64
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@Zblocker64 Zblocker64 requested a review from a team as a code owner September 15, 2025 14:14
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 15, 2025

Walkthrough

The ShellCheck directive above the log_prefix function in install.sh was updated from disabling SC2317 to disabling SC2329. No functional logic, control flow, or public interfaces were changed.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Lint directive update
install.sh
Updated ShellCheck suppression from SC2317 to SC2329 above log_prefix; no runtime or behavioral changes.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

I twitch my whiskers, scripts in sight,
A linty breeze, a subtle byte—
From 2317 to 2329 I hop,
No logic moved, no spinning top.
Just cleaner burrows in shell’s domain,
Thump-thump! The carrots taste the same. 🥕

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 50.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
Description Check ❓ Inconclusive The PR description field is empty ("No pull request description was added"), providing no additional context beyond the title, so there is insufficient information to verify intent or impact under the lenient criteria. Request the author to add a short description summarizing what was changed (the ShellCheck directive update), why it was changed, and any testing or impact notes so reviewers can quickly assess the change.
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title Check ✅ Passed The title "chore: fix shellcheck" is concise and accurately reflects the primary change in the diff—updating a ShellCheck suppression directive—without noise or unrelated details, so it clearly summarizes the main intent of this low-impact lint chore.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix--shellcheck

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
install.sh (1)

133-133: Nit: add a space after the hash in the directive (canonical syntax) and document why.

ShellCheck’s documented form is “# shellcheck disable=…”. Adding the space ensures consistent recognition by tools and matches upstream examples. Consider also noting it’s overridden later. (shellcheck.net)

Apply this diff:

-#shellcheck disable=SC2329
+# shellcheck disable=SC2329  # Intentionally overridden later; this definition is never invoked
📜 Review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8dcc9fc and b673bb7.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • install.sh (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (5)
  • GitHub Check: release-dry-run
  • GitHub Check: lint
  • GitHub Check: coverage
  • GitHub Check: tests
  • GitHub Check: build-bins
🔇 Additional comments (1)
install.sh (1)

133-136: Switching suppression to SC2329 is correct for the shadowed function.

SC2329 flags functions that are never invoked; since this early log_prefix is later overridden and unused, disabling SC2329 here is appropriate. (shellcheck.net)

@troian troian merged commit 4ab1cd9 into main Sep 17, 2025
16 of 18 checks passed
@troian troian deleted the fix--shellcheck branch September 17, 2025 02:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants