Skip to content

Conversation

patbl
Copy link
Contributor

@patbl patbl commented Mar 26, 2015

Am I correct in believing that this is a breaking change? If so, was it intentional?

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 98.14% when pulling 2c01f6b on patbl:master into b71fa85 on andrew:master.

@andrew
Copy link
Member

andrew commented Mar 27, 2015

Yeah that is a breaking change, although I see it more as the internals of the library, rather than the methods that most users with interact with directly, thanks for the pr though 👍

andrew added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2015
Update documentation regarding Split::Experiment.
@andrew andrew merged commit 01faa79 into splitrb:master Mar 27, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants