Skip to content

Conversation

@da1910
Copy link
Collaborator

@da1910 da1910 commented Feb 24, 2022

Closes #156

Add the generate_release_notes flag to the release action to automatically add release notes

@da1910 da1910 requested a review from Andy-Grigg February 24, 2022 11:36
Copy link
Contributor

@Andy-Grigg Andy-Grigg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same comment as in grantami-bomanalytics to consider https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/releasing-projects-on-github/automatically-generated-release-notes#configuration-options, but I think we're good for now.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 9, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #158 (881f617) into main (d3ac080) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #158   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.83%   91.83%           
=======================================
  Files           8        8           
  Lines         821      821           
=======================================
  Hits          754      754           
  Misses         67       67           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update d3ac080...881f617. Read the comment docs.

@da1910 da1910 merged commit 911207f into main Mar 9, 2022
@da1910 da1910 deleted the ci/generate-release-notes branch March 9, 2022 09:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Use generate_release_notes

2 participants