feat: transfer named selections for special boolean subtract

[jonahrb]

Description

Add a specialized _combine_subtract() that has the ability to transfer the named selections of the tool body onto the target body after the subtraction.

Issue linked

Checklist

• I have tested my changes locally.
• I have added necessary documentation or updated existing documentation.
• I have followed the coding style guidelines of this project.
• I have added appropriate unit tests.
• I have reviewed my changes before submitting this pull request.
• I have linked the issue or issues that are solved to the PR if any.
• I have assigned this PR to myself.
• I have added the minimum version decorator to any new backend method implemented.
• I have made sure that the title of my PR follows Conventional commits style (e.g. feat: extrude circle to cylinder)

[jacobrkerstetter]

LGTM 😄

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 78.57143% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 95.07%. Comparing base (61bffdd) to head (b192ab0).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/ansys/geometry/core/designer/body.py	76.92%	3 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2392      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   94.95%   95.07%   +0.12%     
==========================================
  Files         169      169              
  Lines       11327    11341      +14     
==========================================
+ Hits        10755    10783      +28     
+ Misses        572      558      -14     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[RobPasMue]

LGTM affter the small commits I performed for cleanup. Thanks @jonahrb !

[RobPasMue]

@jonahrb - looks like the service doesn't have the features implemented properly? Something's wrong at least - not sure what it is.