Skip to content

Conversation

@jacobrkerstetter
Copy link
Contributor

Description

As title says

Issue linked

Related to #2388

Checklist

  • I have tested my changes locally.
  • I have added necessary documentation or updated existing documentation.
  • I have followed the coding style guidelines of this project.
  • I have added appropriate unit tests.
  • I have reviewed my changes before submitting this pull request.
  • I have linked the issue or issues that are solved to the PR if any.
  • I have assigned this PR to myself.
  • I have added the minimum version decorator to any new backend method implemented.
  • I have made sure that the title of my PR follows Conventional commits style (e.g. feat: extrude circle to cylinder)

@jacobrkerstetter jacobrkerstetter self-assigned this Nov 25, 2025
@jacobrkerstetter jacobrkerstetter requested a review from a team as a code owner November 25, 2025 19:56
@jacobrkerstetter jacobrkerstetter mentioned this pull request Nov 25, 2025
23 tasks
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 25, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 92.16%. Comparing base (456480d) to head (5f8ede5).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2416   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.16%   92.16%           
=======================================
  Files         169      169           
  Lines       11804    11806    +2     
=======================================
+ Hits        10879    10881    +2     
  Misses        925      925           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Member

@RobPasMue RobPasMue left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's move these defaults upwards.. please revisit v0 to make sure that it is aligned as well

Comment on lines +73 to +77
pitch_y=(
from_length_to_grpc_quantity(kwargs["pitch_y"])
if kwargs["pitch_y"]
else from_length_to_grpc_quantity(Distance(0))
),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't this come from the call itself? I would rather avoid any logic inside the _grpc layer

Comment on lines +138 to +143
# Create linear pitch if not None
linear_pitch = (
from_length_to_grpc_quantity(kwargs["linear_pitch"])
if kwargs["linear_pitch"]
else from_length_to_grpc_quantity(Distance(0.0))
)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same here

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants