Implementing dependabot #64
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
RobPasMue
requested review from
ajain-work,
dnwillia-work,
mkundu1 and
seanpearsonuk
seanpearsonuk
approved these changes
Aug 11, 2022
|
Same here, I'd need another reviewer for this PR (when possible 😃) |
dnwillia-work
approved these changes
Aug 12, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I just realized as well that in https://github.com/pyansys/pyfluent-parametric you do not have dependabot implemented. This is a good way of keeping up-to-date our requirements. And following ansys/pyfluent#703 it is also easy to keep up with GH Action updates (they are also important to keep up to date).
If for any reason you do not want to set up dependabot in this repository just close this PR =)