Skip to content

Conversation

@hpohekar
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@hpohekar hpohekar linked an issue Sep 13, 2022 that may be closed by this pull request
@dnwillia-work
Copy link
Collaborator

It's not entirely clear to me what this is for.

@hpohekar
Copy link
Collaborator Author

It's not entirely clear to me what this is for.

We want to use meshing, workflow, solver, PartManagement,, PMFileManagement and preferences as global PyConsole objects while executing python journal. To get this to work seamlessly in PyFluent, we have implemented setup_for_fluent.

@dnwillia-work
Copy link
Collaborator

dnwillia-work commented Sep 14, 2022

It's not entirely clear to me what this is for.

We want to use meshing, workflow, solver, PartManagement,, PMFileManagement and preferences as global PyConsole objects while executing python journal. To get this to work seamlessly in PyFluent, we have implemented setup_for_fluent.

So, that you don't need to type session.solver.<service>.x.y.z and you can instead type <service>.x.y.z?

If so, I'm confused. The thing is that these objects are specific to a session right.

@hpohekar
Copy link
Collaborator Author

It's not entirely clear to me what this is for.

We want to use meshing, workflow, solver, PartManagement,, PMFileManagement and preferences as global PyConsole objects while executing python journal. To get this to work seamlessly in PyFluent, we have implemented setup_for_fluent.

So, that you don't need to type session.solver.<service>.x.y.z and you can instead type <service>.x.y.z?

If so, I'm confused. The thing is that these objects are specific to a session right.

You're right, just one change, we don't need to type session.solver.<service>.x.y.z, we can type solver.<service>.x.y.z, meshing.<service>.x.y.z, workflow.<service>.x.y.z, preferences.<service>.x.y.z etc in python journal.

@seanpearsonuk
Copy link
Collaborator

seanpearsonuk commented Sep 14, 2022

@hpohekar based on recent discussions, we need to add tui to the globally exposed meshing object. We can discuss this.

cc: @mkundu1

@dnwillia-work
Copy link
Collaborator

It's not entirely clear to me what this is for.

We want to use meshing, workflow, solver, PartManagement,, PMFileManagement and preferences as global PyConsole objects while executing python journal. To get this to work seamlessly in PyFluent, we have implemented setup_for_fluent.

So, that you don't need to type session.solver.<service>.x.y.z and you can instead type <service>.x.y.z?
If so, I'm confused. The thing is that these objects are specific to a session right.

You're right, just one change, we don't need to type session.solver.<service>.x.y.z, we can type solver.<service>.x.y.z, meshing.<service>.x.y.z, workflow.<service>.x.y.z, preferences.<service>.x.y.z etc in python journal.

Which means this is useful in the scenario where you want to interact with a single Fluent session right?

@hpohekar
Copy link
Collaborator Author

hpohekar commented Sep 15, 2022

It's not entirely clear to me what this is for.

We want to use meshing, workflow, solver, PartManagement,, PMFileManagement and preferences as global PyConsole objects while executing python journal. To get this to work seamlessly in PyFluent, we have implemented setup_for_fluent.

So, that you don't need to type session.solver.<service>.x.y.z and you can instead type <service>.x.y.z?
If so, I'm confused. The thing is that these objects are specific to a session right.

You're right, just one change, we don't need to type session.solver.<service>.x.y.z, we can type solver.<service>.x.y.z, meshing.<service>.x.y.z, workflow.<service>.x.y.z, preferences.<service>.x.y.z etc in python journal.

Which means this is useful in the scenario where you want to interact with a single Fluent session right?

Yes, right, it will be depend on whether the session is mode=meshing or mode=solver.

@hpohekar
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@hpohekar based on recent discussions, we need to add tui to the globally exposed meshing object. We can discuss this.

cc: @mkundu1

Yes, sure.

@hpohekar hpohekar merged commit 82a6409 into main Sep 20, 2022
@hpohekar hpohekar deleted the feat/setup_for_fluent_latest branch September 20, 2022 13:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

setup_for_fluent

6 participants