Parallelize Parquet Serialization (Alternative Implementation) #7563
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
devinjdangelo
force-pushed
the
parallelize_parquet_with_channel
branch
from
37fb304 to
355d66d
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
This actually turned out to be ~10% faster and slightly lower memory usage in a release build. The approach from this PR is pulled into the main PR now, so I am closing this one as no longer needed. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a draft PR to show an alternative implementation for #7562 which was largely unsuccessful. The goal of this alternative implementation was to reduce memory usage, but it ultimately did not reduce memory usage and also slowed down execution time significantly. See #7562 for benchmarking results.