-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
Open
Description
In the documentation for PartitionEvaluator::evaluate_all_with_rank:
Is there a typo in the example table? It shows the ranks as being 1, 1, 3, 4, 5, but shouldn't it be 1, 1, 3, 4, 4? Or am I just misunderstanding the RANK function somehow?
It's a minor thing, but it did trip me up when I was trying to understand this API.
Also, in the evaluate method above it, there appears to be an extraneous "x":
Evaluate window function on a range of rows in an input partition.x
I hope this isn't a nuisance ticket. Are these okay or should I batch up typos/documentation improvements into bigger issues? Or should I just bypass opening an issue and just submit a PR?
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels