Use pastey instead of paste which is unmaintained

[vii]

The paste crate is no longer maintained according to https://osv.dev/vulnerability/RUSTSEC-2024-0436

pastey claims to be a drop in replacement; following instructions added

+ paste = { package = "pastey", version = "*" }

[alamb]

Thank you @vii . Is there some problem with paste that would need maintenance? Unless there is a problem I am pretty hesitant to take on a new crate with a relatively small distribution

[vii]

@alamb yes that's a great question (see reddit thread). The reason I want to move off paste is to avoid RUSTSEC-2024-0436 which blocks us using it at work.

Would you accept a PR with the token pasting implemented inline in this crate instead?

[alamb]

@alamb yes that's a great question (see reddit thread). The reason I want to move off paste is to avoid RUSTSEC-2024-0436 which blocks us using it at work.

Would you accept a PR with the token pasting implemented inline in this crate instead?

Yes, absolutely, inlining the implementation (or frankly removing the use of paste from this crate) would both be good solutions in my mind