-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.2k
HADOOP-18323.Bump javax.ws.rs-api to 3.1.0 #4522
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Can we wait sometime for HADOOP-15984 to go through? It will take sometime but if we can bump javax.ws.rs-api after Jersey 2 upgrade, that would be less complex. Otherwise we anyways have some complexities and some class clashes because jsr311-api is still being used, please check discussions on HADOOP-18033. cc @ayushtkn |
|
💔 -1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
ayushtkn
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A lot of tests have failed as well....
But what is the CVE all about? are we getting impacted? This CVE is like "CVE from dependency", and the dependency is Junit? Can you check?
Some lines:
In JUnit4 from version 4.7 and before 4.13.1, the test rule TemporaryFolder contains a local information disclosure vulnerability
This vulnerability impacts you if the JUnit tests write sensitive information, like API keys or passwords, into the temporary folder, and the JUnit tests execute in an environment where the OS has other untrusted users.
For Java 1.7 and higher users: this vulnerability is fixed in 4.13.1
Doesn't look like a prod use case to me, second we are already above Juinit. 4.13.1
|
@ayushtkn @virajjasani - Thanks for your comments. I do agree after having all the test case failures and the fact that we are already on junit-4.13.1. It really don't look to me as Prod impacting vulnerability. |
|
we don't distribute junit at all; sole risk would be during manual/automated builds |
|
We're closing this stale PR because it has been open for 100 days with no activity. This isn't a judgement on the merit of the PR in any way. It's just a way of keeping the PR queue manageable. |
Description of PR
Bump javax.ws.rs-api To Version 3.1.0 to mitigate CVE-2020-15250
JIRA - HADOOP-18323
How was this patch tested?
CI/Build
For code changes:
LICENSE,LICENSE-binary,NOTICE-binaryfiles?