YARN-11213. DecommissioningNodesWatcher#logDecommissioningNodesStatus…

[liubin101]

Description of PR

There is a calculation in DecommissioningNodesWatcher#logDecommissioningNodesStatus to calculate app elapsed time:

(mclock.getTime() - rmApp.getStartTime()) / 1000

But mclock.getTime() is generated from System.nanoTime() / NANOSECONDS_PER_MILLISECOND,

rmApp.getStartTime() is generated from System.currentTimeMillis(), they cannot be compared.

This calculation should be:

(System.currentTimeMillis() - rmApp.getStartTime()) / 1000

[hadoop-yetus]

💔 -1 overall

Vote	Subsystem	Runtime	Logfile	Comment
+0 🆗	reexec	0m 51s		Docker mode activated.
			_ Prechecks _
+1 💚	dupname	0m 0s		No case conflicting files found.
+0 🆗	codespell	0m 0s		codespell was not available.
+0 🆗	detsecrets	0m 0s		detect-secrets was not available.
+1 💚	@author	0m 0s		The patch does not contain any @author tags.
-1 ❌	test4tests	0m 0s		The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.
			_ trunk Compile Tests _
+1 💚	mvninstall	41m 12s		trunk passed
+1 💚	compile	1m 17s		trunk passed with JDK Private Build-11.0.15+10-Ubuntu-0ubuntu0.20.04.1
+1 💚	compile	1m 8s		trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_312-8u312-b07-0ubuntu1~20.04-b07
+1 💚	checkstyle	1m 4s		trunk passed
+1 💚	mvnsite	1m 13s		trunk passed
+1 💚	javadoc	1m 9s		trunk passed with JDK Private Build-11.0.15+10-Ubuntu-0ubuntu0.20.04.1
+1 💚	javadoc	0m 54s		trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_312-8u312-b07-0ubuntu1~20.04-b07
+1 💚	spotbugs	2m 20s		trunk passed
+1 💚	shadedclient	24m 27s		branch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
			_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚	mvninstall	0m 56s		the patch passed
+1 💚	compile	1m 6s		the patch passed with JDK Private Build-11.0.15+10-Ubuntu-0ubuntu0.20.04.1
+1 💚	javac	1m 6s		the patch passed
+1 💚	compile	0m 56s		the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_312-8u312-b07-0ubuntu1~20.04-b07
+1 💚	javac	0m 56s		the patch passed
+1 💚	blanks	0m 0s		The patch has no blanks issues.
+1 💚	checkstyle	0m 46s		the patch passed
+1 💚	mvnsite	1m 0s		the patch passed
+1 💚	javadoc	0m 45s		the patch passed with JDK Private Build-11.0.15+10-Ubuntu-0ubuntu0.20.04.1
+1 💚	javadoc	0m 41s		the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_312-8u312-b07-0ubuntu1~20.04-b07
+1 💚	spotbugs	2m 8s		the patch passed
+1 💚	shadedclient	24m 22s		patch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
			_ Other Tests _
+1 💚	unit	102m 30s		hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager in the patch passed.
+1 💚	asflicense	0m 42s		The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
		210m 43s

Subsystem	Report/Notes
Docker	ClientAPI=1.41 ServerAPI=1.41 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-4609/1/artifact/out/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR	#4609
Optional Tests	dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite unit shadedclient spotbugs checkstyle codespell detsecrets
uname	Linux 21b096a4686d 4.15.0-175-generic #184-Ubuntu SMP Thu Mar 24 17:48:36 UTC 2022 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool	maven
Personality	dev-support/bin/hadoop.sh
git revision	trunk / 683fb91
Default Java	Private Build-1.8.0_312-8u312-b07-0ubuntu1~20.04-b07
Multi-JDK versions	/usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64:Private Build-11.0.15+10-Ubuntu-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64:Private Build-1.8.0_312-8u312-b07-0ubuntu1~20.04-b07
Test Results	https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-4609/1/testReport/
Max. process+thread count	901 (vs. ulimit of 5500)
modules	C: hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager U: hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager
Console output	https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-4609/1/console
versions	git=2.25.1 maven=3.6.3 spotbugs=4.2.2
Powered by	Apache Yetus 0.14.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

[github-actions]

We're closing this stale PR because it has been open for 100 days with no activity. This isn't a judgement on the merit of the PR in any way. It's just a way of keeping the PR queue manageable.
If you feel like this was a mistake, or you would like to continue working on it, please feel free to re-open it and ask for a committer to remove the stale tag and review again.
Thanks all for your contribution.