Skip to content

Conversation

@BilwaST
Copy link
Contributor

@BilwaST BilwaST commented Apr 22, 2023

…ication is never initialized.

@hadoop-yetus
Copy link

💔 -1 overall

Vote Subsystem Runtime Logfile Comment
+0 🆗 reexec 0m 45s Docker mode activated.
_ Prechecks _
+1 💚 dupname 0m 0s No case conflicting files found.
+0 🆗 codespell 0m 0s codespell was not available.
+0 🆗 detsecrets 0m 0s detect-secrets was not available.
+1 💚 @author 0m 0s The patch does not contain any @author tags.
-1 ❌ test4tests 0m 0s The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.
_ trunk Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 41m 57s trunk passed
+1 💚 compile 25m 14s trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.18+10-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04.1
+1 💚 compile 21m 43s trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_362-8u362-ga-0ubuntu1~20.04.1-b09
+1 💚 checkstyle 0m 35s trunk passed
+1 💚 mvnsite 0m 38s trunk passed
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 39s trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.18+10-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04.1
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 31s trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_362-8u362-ga-0ubuntu1~20.04.1-b09
+1 💚 spotbugs 1m 3s trunk passed
+1 💚 shadedclient 23m 39s branch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 0m 19s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 24m 37s the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.18+10-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04.1
+1 💚 javac 24m 37s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 21m 45s the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_362-8u362-ga-0ubuntu1~20.04.1-b09
+1 💚 javac 21m 45s the patch passed
+1 💚 blanks 0m 0s The patch has no blanks issues.
+1 💚 checkstyle 0m 28s the patch passed
+1 💚 mvnsite 0m 35s the patch passed
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 32s the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.18+10-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04.1
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 30s the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_362-8u362-ga-0ubuntu1~20.04.1-b09
+1 💚 spotbugs 0m 59s the patch passed
+1 💚 shadedclient 23m 31s patch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
_ Other Tests _
+1 💚 unit 3m 22s hadoop-auth in the patch passed.
+1 💚 asflicense 0m 57s The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
197m 58s
Subsystem Report/Notes
Docker ClientAPI=1.42 ServerAPI=1.42 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-5581/1/artifact/out/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR #5581
Optional Tests dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite unit shadedclient spotbugs checkstyle codespell detsecrets
uname Linux 76cd0460e684 4.15.0-206-generic #217-Ubuntu SMP Fri Feb 3 19:10:13 UTC 2023 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool maven
Personality dev-support/bin/hadoop.sh
git revision trunk / bb7c1ea
Default Java Private Build-1.8.0_362-8u362-ga-0ubuntu1~20.04.1-b09
Multi-JDK versions /usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64:Ubuntu-11.0.18+10-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04.1 /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64:Private Build-1.8.0_362-8u362-ga-0ubuntu1~20.04.1-b09
Test Results https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-5581/1/testReport/
Max. process+thread count 532 (vs. ulimit of 5500)
modules C: hadoop-common-project/hadoop-auth U: hadoop-common-project/hadoop-auth
Console output https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-5581/1/console
versions git=2.25.1 maven=3.6.3 spotbugs=4.2.2
Powered by Apache Yetus 0.14.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

@simbadzina
Copy link
Member

Could you please add a unit test that fails without your change and passes with the change.

Copy link
Member

@ayushtkn ayushtkn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am not sure why it is Boolean object rather than a primitive boolean, but the fix looks fine to me.

How difficult it to extend a test for this?

This change was part of HADOOP-12082. it shows @lmccay as a participant. @lmccay any thoughts/concerns on this?

@ayushtkn ayushtkn requested a review from lmccay November 29, 2023 13:52
@BilwaST
Copy link
Contributor Author

BilwaST commented Dec 15, 2023

Thank you for the review @ayushtkn @simbadzina. I have added testcase for this.

@hadoop-yetus
Copy link

🎊 +1 overall

Vote Subsystem Runtime Logfile Comment
+0 🆗 reexec 0m 31s Docker mode activated.
_ Prechecks _
+1 💚 dupname 0m 0s No case conflicting files found.
+0 🆗 codespell 0m 0s codespell was not available.
+0 🆗 detsecrets 0m 0s detect-secrets was not available.
+1 💚 @author 0m 0s The patch does not contain any @author tags.
+1 💚 test4tests 0m 0s The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test files.
_ trunk Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 43m 12s trunk passed
+1 💚 compile 16m 26s trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.21+9-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04
+1 💚 compile 14m 55s trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_392-8u392-ga-1~20.04-b08
+1 💚 checkstyle 0m 41s trunk passed
+1 💚 mvnsite 0m 44s trunk passed
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 44s trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.21+9-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 40s trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_392-8u392-ga-1~20.04-b08
+1 💚 spotbugs 0m 58s trunk passed
+1 💚 shadedclient 33m 0s branch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 0m 20s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 15m 27s the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.21+9-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04
+1 💚 javac 15m 27s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 14m 50s the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_392-8u392-ga-1~20.04-b08
+1 💚 javac 14m 50s the patch passed
+1 💚 blanks 0m 0s The patch has no blanks issues.
+1 💚 checkstyle 0m 36s the patch passed
+1 💚 mvnsite 0m 42s the patch passed
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 39s the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.21+9-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 39s the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_392-8u392-ga-1~20.04-b08
+1 💚 spotbugs 1m 5s the patch passed
+1 💚 shadedclient 32m 48s patch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
_ Other Tests _
+1 💚 unit 3m 24s hadoop-auth in the patch passed.
+1 💚 asflicense 0m 59s The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
189m 0s
Subsystem Report/Notes
Docker ClientAPI=1.43 ServerAPI=1.43 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-5581/2/artifact/out/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR #5581
Optional Tests dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite unit shadedclient spotbugs checkstyle codespell detsecrets
uname Linux 6dda81a4f9b7 5.15.0-88-generic #98-Ubuntu SMP Mon Oct 2 15:18:56 UTC 2023 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool maven
Personality dev-support/bin/hadoop.sh
git revision trunk / 15a4a26
Default Java Private Build-1.8.0_392-8u392-ga-1~20.04-b08
Multi-JDK versions /usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64:Ubuntu-11.0.21+9-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04 /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64:Private Build-1.8.0_392-8u392-ga-1~20.04-b08
Test Results https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-5581/2/testReport/
Max. process+thread count 556 (vs. ulimit of 5500)
modules C: hadoop-common-project/hadoop-auth U: hadoop-common-project/hadoop-auth
Console output https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-5581/2/console
versions git=2.25.1 maven=3.6.3 spotbugs=4.2.2
Powered by Apache Yetus 0.14.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

Copy link
Member

@ayushtkn ayushtkn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should be fine.
@simbadzina any comments?

simbadzina

This comment was marked as outdated.

* Constant for disabling the host name verification for this handler.
*/
private static final String DISABLE_HOSTNAME_VERIFICATION = TYPE +
".hostname.verification.disable";
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you please also add this new config in core-site default.

@simbadzina simbadzina dismissed their stale review May 31, 2024 15:24

Requested a change to document new config.

@BilwaST
Copy link
Contributor Author

BilwaST commented May 31, 2024

@simbadzina None of the configs added in this file are added to core-default.xml. I'm thinking we can plan to add it as part of new jira. Would it be ok? Thanks

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

We're closing this stale PR because it has been open for 100 days with no activity. This isn't a judgement on the merit of the PR in any way. It's just a way of keeping the PR queue manageable.
If you feel like this was a mistake, or you would like to continue working on it, please feel free to re-open it and ask for a committer to remove the stale tag and review again.
Thanks all for your contribution.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Oct 22, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot closed this Oct 23, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants