Skip to content

Backport of junichi11's fixes made after Apr 22, 2017#607

Merged
geertjanw merged 15 commits intoapache:2ndDonationfrom
junichi11:after_donation_junichi11
Jun 27, 2018
Merged

Backport of junichi11's fixes made after Apr 22, 2017#607
geertjanw merged 15 commits intoapache:2ndDonationfrom
junichi11:after_donation_junichi11

Conversation

@junichi11
Copy link
Member

junichi11 added 15 commits June 27, 2018 02:09
Don't add <b></b> twice.
WARNING [org.netbeans.modules.editor.completion.PatchedHtmlRenderer]: Closing bold tag w/o opening bold tag
WARNING [org.netbeans.modules.editor.completion.PatchedHtmlRenderer]:   <font color=#00003C><b><b>$GLOBALS</b></b></font>
WARNING [org.netbeans.modules.editor.completion.PatchedHtmlRenderer]:                                          ^
WARNING [org.netbeans.modules.editor.completion.PatchedHtmlRenderer]:  Full HTML string:<font color=#00003C><b><b>$GLOBALS</b></b></font>
Uniform variable syntax part. Some features(CC, GotoDeclaration, MarkOccurrences) don't work with (...) expression yet.
… are declared with pipe (|) during auto-complete
Also, fix missing unhandled errors(e.g. foo()(), foo->bar()(), Foo::bar()()).
@geertjanw
Copy link
Member

Very cool. Should we wait to relicense everything in the 2nd donation or integrate this there already?

@junichi11
Copy link
Member Author

junichi11 commented Jun 27, 2018

I'm not sure but some people (e.g. @JaroslavTulach, @sdedic, @dbalek ) did the same thing in the 1st donation.
Furthermore, I have 8 patches for new features. When I worked on them, I didn't push them because new feature phase was already past. So I just attached them to each issue. e.g.

I would like to merge them as soon as possible because I'm not sure whether I can apply patches correctly after license headers are changed.

If there is a problem, I'll just wait :)
Thanks!

@geertjanw
Copy link
Member

Are there any that need to be reviewed or should we merge them all without additional steps? Up to you, either way, happy to do what you think best.

@junichi11
Copy link
Member Author

I suppose we need not review them. I hope that they are merged if anyone else has no objection. I'll wait a while.

@geertjanw
Copy link
Member

OK, merging.

@geertjanw geertjanw merged commit 918cddf into apache:2ndDonation Jun 27, 2018
@junichi11
Copy link
Member Author

junichi11 commented Jun 27, 2018

Probably, in this case, we should not squash & merge because it would be big one commit and it would be hard to find specified changes...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants