Skip to content

Conversation

@adnanhemani
Copy link
Contributor

As per ML thread. This should cause a major version upgrade - as such, do not merge until Polaris 2.x.x is ready.

@dimas-b
Copy link
Contributor

dimas-b commented Sep 19, 2025

If I'm not mistaken this change stems from https://lists.apache.org/thread/wbmvf8s0sdwhfn8p91pwqsxolxd2btj4

I am personally not convinced that changing the response code is worth the possible ripple effects on the client side.

I believe it might be worth a dedicated dev ML discussion to highlight the rationale for the response code change as the previous email discussion does not appear to indicate why the new response code is preferable, but mentions it only as a possible alternative.

@adnanhemani
Copy link
Contributor Author

Issue for this here: #2657

@dimas-b
Copy link
Contributor

dimas-b commented Sep 24, 2025

More specific discussion thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread/bhd1srzks0pz0odoqmm87gfyj2yz2k41

@github-actions
Copy link

This PR is stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 5 days.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Oct 25, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot closed this Oct 30, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from PRs In Progress to Done in Basic Kanban Board Oct 30, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants