-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 28.9k
[SPARK-35763][SS] Remove the StateStoreCustomMetric subclass enumeration dependency #32914
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5cfe08b
[SPARK-35763][SS] Add a new copy method to StateStoreCustomMetric
vkorukanti 8a98bde
Add a method to `StateStoreCustomMetric` to create a `SQLMetric`
vkorukanti 2576197
Add UT
vkorukanti 7211c4b
Fix the test to close SparkContext
vkorukanti File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
didn't quite get why it worths the effort, you have add code either here or in the case class. no difference to me.
or maybe you can save the effort by provide some default implementation.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The main point is to avoid making changes here (in
SymmetricHashJoinManager) whenever you add a new case class. You just add all the code required in the case class when a new one is added. It is easy to miss adding the code here and with this patch we can avoid exposing the subclasses ofStateStoreCustomMetrichere.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1
this is easier to maintain. exhaustive enumeration of subclasses is brittle to addition of subclasses.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it would be even better if with some scala magic the default implementation could be provided. but its not obvious to me how, because this is calling the copy constructor which is not available in any trait.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we are also considering extension point from outside (like 3rd party state store provider) to add a new implementation of
StateStoreCustomMetric, we should definitely not suppose the new implementation to be a case class havingdescas field. (Even they have it, we can't leverage it unless doing reflection.) I think this is the right way to do.