Skip to content

Conversation

@TorstenDittmann
Copy link
Contributor

@TorstenDittmann TorstenDittmann commented Nov 12, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Simplified role deletion handling in the permissions interface by consolidating internal deletion logic.

@appwrite
Copy link

appwrite bot commented Nov 12, 2025

Console (appwrite/console)

Project ID: 688b7bf400350cbd60e9

Sites (1)
Site Status Logs Preview QR
 console-stage
688b7cf6003b1842c9dc
Ready Ready View Logs Preview URL QR Code

Tip

Environment variable changes require redeployment to take effect

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 12, 2025

Walkthrough

A single prop removal in the permissions.svelte component changes how the Row component is invoked within a role table cell. The onNotFound callback prop was removed, shifting deletion error handling from an explicit per-row callback to alternative handling mechanisms. This is a focused change in one file affecting a single component invocation.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

  • Row component behavior: Verify how the Row component now handles deletion scenarios without the onNotFound callback and confirm internal behavior or alternative handlers are sufficient.
  • Deletion flow: Understand why this callback is no longer required and confirm the permission deletion workflow remains intact.
  • Error handling: Check if deletion errors are now handled elsewhere or if this represents intentional removal of specific error handling logic.

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the specific change made: removing/commenting out the onNotFound prop handler in the Row component within the permissions template.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix-prevent-row-deletion

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e02c4e2 and a56be7a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/lib/components/permissions/permissions.svelte (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
  • GitHub Check: e2e
  • GitHub Check: build
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/lib/components/permissions/permissions.svelte (1)

143-143: No changes needed—Row component handles missing onNotFound prop gracefully.

The Row component is designed defensively: the onNotFound prop is optional, and it uses optional chaining (onNotFound?.(role)) to invoke it safely. The component renders correctly whether the prop is passed or not. Role deletion remains fully functional via the delete button and works independently of any Row callback. The Row component also properly handles the notFound state in the UI display, showing appropriate fallback content when data is unavailable.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@TorstenDittmann TorstenDittmann merged commit a8bdb86 into main Nov 12, 2025
1 of 4 checks passed
@TorstenDittmann TorstenDittmann deleted the fix-prevent-row-deletion branch November 12, 2025 21:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants