-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 198
chore: update scope descriptions for database index access #2625
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Since the database terminology change, we should be using "table" rather then "collection"
Console (appwrite/console)Project ID: Tip Appwrite has crossed the 50K GitHub stars milestone with hundreds of active contributors |
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@stnguyen90 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 8 minutes and 23 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThe pull request updates two scope description strings in Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/lib/constants.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: ItzNotABug
Repo: appwrite/console PR: 2413
File: src/routes/(console)/project-[region]-[project]/databases/database-[database]/(entity)/views/indexes/view.svelte:84-84
Timestamp: 2025-10-09T12:22:41.099Z
Learning: In the Appwrite console databases UI, user-facing labels like "Columns" should remain unchanged even when internal terminology changes to "fields". The multi-terminology support refactors internal data models without changing the user-facing text.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
- GitHub Check: e2e
- GitHub Check: build
Corrected possessive form in database index descriptions.
4df60f5 to
fcd523b
Compare

What does this PR do?
Since the database terminology change, we should be using "table" rather then "collection"
Test Plan
None
Related PRs and Issues
Have you read the Contributing Guidelines on issues?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.