Skip to content

Conversation

@stnguyen90
Copy link
Contributor

@stnguyen90 stnguyen90 commented Nov 21, 2025

What does this PR do?

Since the database terminology change, we should be using "table" rather then "collection"

Test Plan

None

Related PRs and Issues

Have you read the Contributing Guidelines on issues?

Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Clarified two scope descriptions to reference database table indexes (read and write) instead of collection indexes.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

Since the database terminology change, we should be using "table" rather then "collection"
@appwrite
Copy link

appwrite bot commented Nov 21, 2025

Console (appwrite/console)

Project ID: 688b7bf400350cbd60e9

Sites (1)
Site Status Logs Preview QR
 console-stage
688b7cf6003b1842c9dc
Ready Ready View Logs Preview URL QR Code

Tip

Appwrite has crossed the 50K GitHub stars milestone with hundreds of active contributors

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 21, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@stnguyen90 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 8 minutes and 23 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4df60f5 and fcd523b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/lib/constants.ts (1 hunks)

Walkthrough

The pull request updates two scope description strings in src/lib/constants.ts. The descriptions for scopes.indexes.read and scopes.indexes.write were modified to replace references to "database collection's indexes" with "database table's indexes". These are documentation-only updates with no changes to function signatures, types, or logic.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

  • Single file with only two string constant updates
  • Homogeneous changes (identical edit pattern applied twice)
  • No logic, type, or structural modifications
  • Verify the terminology change (collection vs. table) is semantically correct and intentional

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the main change: updating scope descriptions for database index access from 'collection' to 'table' terminology.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 345acee and 570316d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/lib/constants.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: ItzNotABug
Repo: appwrite/console PR: 2413
File: src/routes/(console)/project-[region]-[project]/databases/database-[database]/(entity)/views/indexes/view.svelte:84-84
Timestamp: 2025-10-09T12:22:41.099Z
Learning: In the Appwrite console databases UI, user-facing labels like "Columns" should remain unchanged even when internal terminology changes to "fields". The multi-terminology support refactors internal data models without changing the user-facing text.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
  • GitHub Check: e2e
  • GitHub Check: build

Corrected possessive form in database index descriptions.
@stnguyen90 stnguyen90 force-pushed the chore-api-key-scopes-description branch from 4df60f5 to fcd523b Compare November 21, 2025 02:43
@stnguyen90 stnguyen90 requested a review from abnegate November 21, 2025 02:43
@abnegate abnegate merged commit 81c53a4 into main Nov 21, 2025
4 checks passed
@abnegate abnegate deleted the chore-api-key-scopes-description branch November 21, 2025 04:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants