Skip to content

Conversation

ChiragAgg5k
Copy link
Member

@ChiragAgg5k ChiragAgg5k commented Oct 17, 2025

This PR contains updates to the Swift SDK for version 13.2.2.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Fixed a build failure caused by a missing dependency in version 13.2.2.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 17, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request represents a patch release (version 13.2.2) for the Appwrite Swift SDK. The primary change adds "AppwriteEnums" as a dependency to the AppwriteModels target in Package.swift to resolve a missing dependency that caused build failures. Supporting changes update version references from 13.2.1 to 13.2.2 in CHANGELOG.md, README.md, and the x-sdk-version header in Client.swift to maintain consistency across the project.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

The changes are straightforward and repetitive, consisting primarily of version number updates across multiple files paired with one simple dependency addition. The AppwriteEnums dependency is added directly to the manifest without conditional logic or complex modifications. The homogeneous nature of the version bumps and the absence of behavioral or logic changes make this a low-complexity review.

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check ✅ Passed The PR title "feat: Swift SDK update for version 13.2.2" directly relates to the changeset, which contains version-related updates across multiple files including CHANGELOG.md, Package.swift, README.md, and Client.swift. The title clearly indicates the version bump to 13.2.2, and while it doesn't explicitly mention the underlying functional change (adding the missing AppwriteEnums dependency), it accurately summarizes the scope of the release. The title is concise, specific with the version number, and provides sufficient clarity for someone reviewing the git history to understand this is a version 13.2.2 update.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch dev

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1c6ce93 and 5fa6a48.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
  • Package.swift (1 hunks)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
  • Sources/Appwrite/Client.swift (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
Sources/Appwrite/Client.swift (1)

24-24: LGTM! Version header updated correctly.

The SDK version header has been properly updated to reflect the new patch release version.

Package.swift (1)

40-45: LGTM! Missing dependency correctly added.

The addition of AppwriteEnums as a dependency to the AppwriteModels target resolves the build failure. This correctly declares the direct dependency relationship when AppwriteModels references types from AppwriteEnums.

CHANGELOG.md (1)

3-6: LGTM! Changelog entry is accurate and well-formatted.

The changelog entry correctly documents the fix for the missing AppwriteEnums dependency and follows the established format.

README.md (1)

36-36: LGTM! Documentation updated to reflect the new version.

The Swift Package Manager dependency example correctly references version 13.2.2, ensuring developers will install the latest patch release.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@abnegate abnegate merged commit 4903240 into main Oct 17, 2025
1 of 2 checks passed
@ChiragAgg5k ChiragAgg5k deleted the dev branch October 17, 2025 06:59
@abnegate abnegate restored the dev branch October 17, 2025 07:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants