Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore!: remove gob support from tracee-rules #3939

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 1, 2024

Conversation

geyslan
Copy link
Member

@geyslan geyslan commented Mar 27, 2024

1. Explain what the PR does

ec64498 chore!: remove gob support from tracee-rules

This finishes the removal of gob support after #3841.

2. Explain how to test it

3. Other comments

This finishes the removal of gob support after aquasecurity#3841.
@geyslan geyslan requested a review from yanivagman March 27, 2024 23:56
@geyslan geyslan self-assigned this Mar 27, 2024
geyslan added a commit to geyslan/tracee that referenced this pull request Mar 28, 2024
When policies version was implemented, the initial idea was to pass
the policies pointer in the event, so that the correct policies version
could be reused at each stage of the pipeline without having to
retrieve it from the snapshots every time. However, this was not
possible at the time since the gob library does not support
unsafe.Pointer types.

After aquasecurity#3939, Tracee no longer uses gob, so the policies pointer can be
passed in the event as originally intended.
@geyslan geyslan mentioned this pull request Mar 28, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@yanivagman yanivagman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@geyslan geyslan merged commit dd02740 into aquasecurity:main Apr 1, 2024
33 checks passed
@geyslan geyslan deleted the gob-removal branch June 28, 2024 18:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants