Move SqlStatementExecutor functionality into RelationalCommand #3399
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
|
|
mikary
force-pushed
the
sqlStatementExecutor
branch
from
e6fafde to
af6aef1
Compare
mikary
force-pushed
the
sqlStatementExecutor
branch
from
af6aef1 to
2887b8b
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Incremental change for #3110
Fix #3205 -
SqliteRelationalConnectionAdditional work to be done relates to fixing calls on
SqlStatementExecutor.ExecuteReaderwhich currently do not disposeDbCommands, removingCreateDbCommandfrom the public interface ofIRelationalCommand, and general cleanup to consumers of the new API