Added instruction to install unzip in order to unpack runtime packages

[onatm]

Added instruction to install unzip in order to prevent getting an error message when dnvm use is executed.

• When I followed the instructions in Getting Started I ran into Cannot find dnx-mono.1.0.0-beta4, do you need to run 'dnvm install 1.0.0-beta4'?. This is solved by installing unzip package.

[dnfclas]

Hi @onatm, I'm your friendly neighborhood .NET Foundation Pull Request Bot (You can call me DNFBOT). Thanks for your contribution!

This seems like a small (but important) contribution, so no Contribution License Agreement is required at this point. Real humans will now evaluate your PR.

TTYL, DNFBOT;

[Eilon]

@glennc ?

[ghost]

Does this conflicts with #627? If latter is merged then the instruction to run the command would be rendered redundant.

[onatm]

@jasonwilliams200OK it conflicts with #627. However, you don't need unzip to install libuv as mentioned in #627.

[onatm]

any update?

[glennc]

I'm ok with this one, but perhaps it makes sense to just add a general pre-reqs section to the top of the instructions, what do you think?

[onatm]

You are right, general pre-reqs section would be more useful. So, should i create another pr for it?

[ghost]

@onatm, you can amend the commits of this PR:

# cd into-aspnet-home-directory
notepad .\README
# make changes in the file
# save and close the file
git push -f

[glennc]

I am ok with whatever works best for you, closing this and starting another or amending this one.

[onatm]

Does it look OK now?

[glennc]

Yeah, looking good. Can you move curl to the prerequisites section as well? Get it out of the kestrel install step.

On a side note we should make DNVM more flexible so that it can work with wget as well at some point: https://github.com/aspnet/dnvm/blob/dev/src/dnvm.sh#L74

But that is a different issue, for a another time...

[onatm]

I added 'Get Curl' to prerequisites section.

I am looking forward to wget download option 👀

[onatm]

ping 🔔

[glennc]

Seems good. @danroth27 are you ok with this?

[danroth27]

Sure
At some point we should probably transition all of the Home repo content to just point to http://docs.asp.net.