Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Dec 13, 2018. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@brentschmaltz
Copy link
Contributor

Replacement #233
Changed logic for user-state
Added additional testing

Removed AuthenticationProperties as a Property on notification.
Added tests for sending and receiving 'user' state.
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fix this comment.

@Tratcher
Copy link
Member

Close your old PR if you're done with it.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You could put it in OpenIdConnectAuthenticationDefaults.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think that would work, will make that change.

Logging level, IsNullOrEmpty for string, comment tests, const for userstate property.
SetUserState method has single focus.
@brentschmaltz
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Tratcher @Eilon can you guys have a look at the latest.
I think we should make the change for leaving the notifications null and only engaging if !null.

@kevinchalet
Copy link
Contributor

@brentschmaltz I'm not sure it's really worth it. Anyway, we'll probably switch to good old methods in a future PR to match the pattern used by the OAuth2 middleware, so you won't have to care about null values in the handler itself: #257 (comment)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This method seems rather trivial and is used only once in the handler. Maybe you can remove it?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@PinpointTownes can you help me understand about leaving the notifications NON null (setting default no-ops in OpenIdConnectAuthenticationNotifications). I thinks there is a gain here, if the user hasn't set a notification, then no need to new up the Notification and call a no-op.

I opened
#307

+1 on removing the mini-method: SetUserStateOnMessage

@brentschmaltz
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Eilon this PR has been marked cla-required. What do I need to do?

@Eilon
Copy link
Contributor

Eilon commented Jun 29, 2015

@brentschmaltz I sent you mail about the CLA.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can use Assert.Equal.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes but there is no overload that has a message.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One top-level type per file

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

updated.

@dnfclas
Copy link

dnfclas commented Jun 29, 2015

@brentschmaltz, Thanks for signing the contribution license agreement so quickly! Actual humans will now validate the agreement and then evaluate the PR.

Thanks, DNFBOT;

Some types to vars.
urls -> example.com
…to StateAndTests

Conflicts:
	test/Microsoft.AspNet.Authentication.Test/OpenIdConnect/OpenIdConnectHandlerTests.cs
	test/Microsoft.AspNet.Authentication.Test/OpenIdConnect/OpenIdConnectMiddlewareTests.cs
	test/Microsoft.AspNet.Authentication.Test/OpenIdConnect/TestUtilities.cs
@Tratcher
Copy link
Member

Making progress. You'll need to rebase after all the changes that went into Security last week.

@brentschmaltz
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Tratcher there are too many diff's to rebase.I will have to craft a new PR.

@kevinchalet
Copy link
Contributor

@brentschmaltz why are you so afraid of rebasing? 😄
It's actually far easier to rebase (even when there are merge conflicts) than creating a whole new PR.

@brentschmaltz
Copy link
Contributor Author

updated

@Tratcher Tratcher deleted the StateAndTests branch August 7, 2017 17:06
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants