Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Dec 15, 2022. It is now read-only.

Conversation

Spirou07
Copy link
Contributor

Requirements

  • Filling out the template is required. Any pull request that does not include enough information to be reviewed in a timely manner may be closed at the maintainers' discretion.
  • All new code requires tests to ensure against regressions

Description of the Change

Change to correct bug of #116 , arrays are now correctly detected as a type.

Alternate Designs

Benefits

Correct syntax highlight for array as type.

Possible Drawbacks

Applicable Issues

#116

@Spirou07
Copy link
Contributor Author

I fixed the code to fulfill the spec so let me know please.

Copy link
Contributor

@sadikovi sadikovi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. Thanks for fixing this! Do existing tests cover new additions? Would you mind adding one with an example from the issue? Thanks.

@Spirou07
Copy link
Contributor Author

Here are the tests! I added them in the class fields test.

@sadikovi
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM. Thanks for the tests.

@50Wliu would you mind having a look at this? Thanks!

@winstliu winstliu merged commit f37520c into atom:master Dec 31, 2017
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants