Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 28 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.Sign up
support @std/esm #1618
@jamestalmage just so I understand, this detects the
@std/esm require and replaces the
require() method we use for other
Is there a remaining issue with how we load the transpiled test files, or how we transpile them to begin with?
(Apologies for the notification spam.) As the original reporter of standard-things/esm#197, I just want to express appreciation for everyone working on this. Always awesome to see OSS projects come together to support interoperability for users. Thanks y'all
@novemberborn - The only other issue would be providing a way to bypass the main thread precompilation. In that case, the package sniffing I am doing wouldn't be needed.
That's tracked elsewhere, but in any case it's entirely conceivable that users may want to use
@std/esm while still using AVA's transpilations.
I think we should still tighten up the pattern match, and per @jdalton's comments could clean up the
I know you're generally quite busy @jamestalmage (so thanks for chiming in with this PR!). Let me know if you'd like me to land it instead.
I was pretty floored by everyone jumping in to help out. It's such a pleasant surprise to have to rein in adjustments. Double thanks to y'all